[process] Re: [governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here

[Parminder]

McTim

> If the insulter wasn't our only coordinator, I would ask that the
> other coordinator privately warn him against this sort of behaviour.

The other co-coordinator will in place within the next two weeks. I will
announce the election process/ schedule within the next 24 hours.

You can then try that channel. And there is of course the 'appeals
committee'. In fact, speaking in humour, you should explore buying a
season-pass with them. You seem to object to every single thing I ever do,
and it is getting a bit tiring.

Parminder 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:44 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder
> Subject: [process] Re: [governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here
> 
> Parminder,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
> wrote:
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > In political arenas one who clearly professes a political position (as
> John
> > Levine unapologetically does to a neo-imperialist ideology -
> 
> This is, to me, a personal insult, which is prohibited by our charter.
> 
> Quoting the charter:
> 
> "Some of the specific guidelines that will be enforced include those
> relating to:
> 
>           o
> 
>             No personal insults
>           o
> 
>             No spam
>     *
> 
>       Failure to abide by netiquette guidelines may result in
> suspension or removal from the IGC list according to the following
> process:
>           o
> 
>             The coordinators will first warn a subscriber privately of
> the problem"
> 
> 
> 
> If the insulter wasn't our only coordinator, I would ask that the
> other coordinator privately warn him against this sort of behaviour.
> At the very least, you should withdraw your use of the term
> "neo-imperialist", and apologise to JL publicly.
> 
> 
> 'things aren't
> > going to change, just accept and submit to the big bully')
> 
> This is:
> 
> A) not what he said
> B) not "neo-imperialist" (according to the only definition of it I
> could find online:
> http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=neo-imperialism)
> 
> As a (very) long time ICANN watcher and participant, JL (who I have
> never met personally BTW) has a much greater range of experience on
> these issues than most on this list.  Pointing out the facts ("The US
> DOC has always made it crystal clear that they will never under any
> plausible conditions relinquish their authority over the DNS root and,
> hence, over ICANN.") can only help this caucus come to an informed
> perspective on this issue, and should not draw personal attacks (don't
> shoot the messenger just because you don't like the message).
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> mctim.blogspot.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance