[governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here

[Jeffrey A. Williams]

Ian and all,

  Yes this is an alternative, but one that currently and sense ICANN's
conception, one that puts the insane in charge of the asylum.  Not
a very palatable or viable alternative.

  Perhaps when users hold the majority of ICANN's Bod seats,
this alternative will become much more viable.  But the GNSO
structure will need drastic changes to reflect such.  Currently,
and under the most recent proposed GNSO structure revision,
that is not the case.  I and most users or users-domain name
holders are neither adequately represented on ICANN's Bod,
nor do same approve of the IPC's behavior and influence
on the ICANN Bod.

Ian Peter wrote:

> Or alternatively, as McTim suggests, no authorisation structure.
>
> Or what about an ICANN MOU with the UN as a first step? That appeals to me
> as something that might get traction at both ends and we could support.
>
> Ian Peter
> Ian Peter and Associates Pty Ltd
> PO Box 10670 Adelaide St  Brisbane 4000
> Australia
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Peter [mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com]
> > Sent: 06 August 2008 16:51
> > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; 'William Drake'
> > Subject: RE: [governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > >
> > > > Might help shift the debate a little if for the next review NTIA were
> > to
> > > > hear a LOT more from proponents of change, including a fleshed out and
> > > > plausible scenario as to how independence would work geopolitically,
> > why
> > > > there'd be no real risk of "takeover by foreign governments," how we
> > > could
> > > > have rock solid guarantees of exactly the same levels of security,
> > > > stability, and control in the last instance as now.   Something that
> > > would
> > > > make ITAA, DOD, et al say, hmmm...I don't think this has been done yet
> > > > either by ICANN or others, so expecting a leap of faith in the beltway
> > > seems
> > > > ill-advised.  Those are reserved for other issues...
> > >
> > > If enough people here believe this is a top priority, maybe the caucus
> > > could
> > > try to do something productive for a change and develop a compelling
> > > alternative and promote it in a manner that is politically salient.
> > Then
> > > maybe Milton would have a better chance of winning his $50 bet with me
> > as
> > > to
> > > whether an Obama administration (inshallah) would do something in 9/09.
> > >
> > The assumption here is that a compelling argument to DOC is advanced and
> > they suddenly change their mind. That might work. Another possibility is
> > for
> > ICANN to move offshore, restructure, set up an alternative authorisation
> > structure with the UN, create another A root, and then the emperor has no
> > clothes. Not hard to do if the will exists and ICANN really wants change.
> >
> > (you might say that I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.....)
> >
> > Ian Peter
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release Date: 8/5/2008
> > 6:03 AM
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance