[governance] IGC workshop: A rights agenda for Internet

[Adam Peake]

Karen, as I mentioned regarding the Transboundary 
Internet workshop, the proposal does not need to 
be complete for April 30.  More compete the form 
the better, so don't stop!  But at this time you 
can make general comments rather than specific. 
You don't need names of all who you want 
involved, just say who you want involved, what 
point of view.

A straightforward description of what the 
workshop will be about and what interests will be 
represented will let us all see what issues 
people think important.  With the proposals and 
any discussion from the open consultation, the 
MAG should be able to start more detailed 
discussion of the programme. We'll all be able to 
see what other's are working on, perhaps join 
them, merge ideas, etc.

There's been a bit of discussion about this on 
the MAG list and it's in the email digests of the 
MAG discussions (which I guess people have 
stopped reading... they are pretty dull.) 
<http://intgovforum.org/forum/index.php?topic=426.0>

Adam



At 11:11 AM +0100 4/25/08, karen banks wrote:
>Dear all
>
>A working group comprised of the following folk 
>have worked hard to draft a proposal on:
>
>A rights agenda for internet goernance
>
>The working group included : Michael Gurstein, 
>Parminder Jeet Singh,  Lisa Horner, Konstantinos 
>Komaitis, Vittorio Bertola, Robin Gross, Robert 
>Guerra, rafik dammak, linda misek-falkoff and 
>myself. I believe posts were also shared from 
>time to time with the bill or rights coalition. 
>(colleagues - please clarify any omissions i may 
>have made in that list..)
>
>It was a very interesting drafting process, and 
>we fully realise that this is a complex and 
>challenging topic to bring to the IGF Table - 
>but we are convinced that it is not only 
>relevant to the IGF Mandate, but central to the 
>mandate and the long term impact of the IGF 
>process.
>
>Please review the attached draft - we look 
>forward to your comments in relation to
>
>- the substantive sections (q2 and q6)
>- ideas for panellists and main actors in the field (q3)
>- ideas for 2 or 3 additional co-sponsors (q4)
>- your thoughts on which theme(s) the proposal 
>best fits with - i would say it's an 'missing' 
>crosscut ;)
>
>we'll take a round of comments til end monday 
>(april 28th) and take it from there..
>
>thanks everyone
>
>karen (for michael, parminder and the working group)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:IGF_RAIG_Final.doc (WDBN/«IC») (00578DF3)
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance