[governance] coordinator elections
Parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Wed Apr 23 10:12:40 EDT 2008
Izumi
Izumi
No intention to make things complicated but I understand your dilemma. But I
have to conduct elections and also reply to members queries whether we have
a list of subscribed members.
> Parminder, do you request new members to say if they subscribe to the
> charter and then given the voting right?
All 'new' members were already asked, and I have a separate list of those
who have subscribed.
>Or do you request all members
> do so again even they did before?
Nobody has done any process of 'subscribing' to the charter. There was a
vote on the charter which went 56 - 3, with a quorum of 67 (including votes
rendered invalid for technical reasons). We DONT have a list of those who
voted 'for' the charter.
Or, Avri, do you suggest that those who
> subscribed the list for more than two months be given the voting right,
> but
> by voting they must be treated as they have subscribed to the charter?
> (To me that seems OK, but I want to confirm).
That what Avri says. But I don't understand how does by voting one gets
treated as having subscribed to the charter. And what of those who do not
vote because they just do not care to make a choice on co-coordinator issue.
They become/ remain non-members?
This way we still wont have a members list
Whats wrong with sending an email to all asking if they have read and
subscribe to the charter they cut paste a single line in reply. And on that
basis prepare a members list, which is then the voting list (with 2 month on
the list criteria added).
Is what you are suggesting that we add a line on the ballot - if you vote,
it will be taken that you have read the charter and subscribe to it.. A lot
round about manner of ascertaining the primary criterion of membership per
the charter but that fine, if everyone wants that. And I cant understand
what advantage does it have vis a vis a more direct process I suggested.
And if we go by it still not have a full membership list. And remember even
last time less people voted in the co-coordinator election than in the
charter process. People often make that choice. And members have asked for
that list, which I don't think is an unfair request.
Lastly, I am asking this purely from a practical point of view. I need to
conduct the elections as per the charter. I will go with whatever veers
towards a consensus position here.
Parminder
> -----Original Message-----
> From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [mailto:izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Izumi
> AIZU
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 7:11 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder
> Cc: Avri Doria
> Subject: Re: [governance] coordinator elections
>
> Sorry, I could not understand what was the real issue having read several
> posts only once. And I don't have too much time to read them twice.
>
> Could someone explain in a simple and cons ice message what is the
> real issue?
>
> Parminder, do you request new members to say if they subscribe to the
> charter and then given the voting right? Or do you request all members
> do so again even they did before? Or, Avri, do you suggest that those who
> subscribed the list for more than two months be given the voting right,
> but
> by voting they must be treated as they have subscribed to the charter?
> (To me that seems OK, but I want to confirm).
>
> Sorry for my ignorance.
>
> izumi
>
> 2008/4/23, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As you know i strongly disagreed with your interpretation when you
> > > first spoke to me of it a while back. But you are right, it could
> > > be seen as a matter of interpretation. I don't accept your
> > > interpretation and have stated what i will do, or rather what I will
> > > not do.
> > >
> > > If this means I can't vote, then it means i can't vote. Over time,
> > > especially as a US citizen, I have learned to value the vote very
> > > little and have no personal objection to being disenfranchised in
> this
> > > case.
> > >
> > > a.
> >
> >
> > Avri, I request you not to take such an extreme stand. It is a simple
> and
> > relatively straightforward organizational matter that we are trying to
> sort
> > out, and I am sure we will collectively be able to do it.
> >
> >
> > Parminder
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > > governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> > > governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> > >
> > > For all list information and functions, see:
> > > http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> > governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> > http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> >> Izumi Aizu <<
>
> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita
> Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo
> Japan
> * * * * *
> << Writing the Future of the History >>
> www.anr.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list