[governance] rights based approach to the Internet

[ABDEL Rabia]

Salut Jean Louis
   
  C'est Rabia de ENDA TM : nous nous sommes rencontrés qq fois et croisé sur des listes.
  J'ai souri à ta remarque , mais ne pourrions nous pas intervenir un peu plus sur le débat de fond.
  Je vais commencer car il y a trop de banalités entendues sur le "marché".
  Amitiés cordiales
  Rabia

jlfullsack <jlfullsack at wanadoo.fr> a écrit :
  Dear Avri
I do hope you know a lot more in economics than in italian politics. 
However, Tremonti is well known and not only by insiders. He was the 
"economist" in both the former Berlusconi's gouvenrments, with the 
"succcess" You (should) know.
Best
Jean-Louis Fullsack

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avri Doria" 
To: "Governance Caucus" 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [governance] rights based approach to the Internet


> Hi,
>
> not that i want to get n the middle of this 20th century argument, but i 
> read an interesting line in a letter to the Editor of the Financial Times 
> today (oh no, what am i admitting) by Giulio Tremonti (an Italian 
> politician - don't know what his role is thse days) in defense of 
> accusations of protectionism:
>
> "market if possible, state if necessary"
>
> Now i don't now if i agree with much of what he says, as his letter is 
> all i have ever read of his, but this seems to be a reasonable position 
> at first blush.
>
> And in today's world it looks like the market is being effective in some 
> places, but some places need more help then the market is likely to give. 
> And since (fortunately or unfortunately depending on your viewpoint) we 
> have states and collections of states and associations of states ... , 
> they might as well be asked to do something useful for the people.
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 11:47, Michael Gurstein wrote:
>> No, what we're dealing with in your case is a kind of incantatory 
>> anti-market fundamentalism, something that folks in civil society should 
>> have moved beyond in 1991 1930, if not sooner. But old habits die hard, 
>> which is why I make an issue of it on this list.
>>
>> I'm perfectly willing to entertain policy market interventions in the 
>> market in support of public policy goods when beneficial. But let's I'll 
>> give competitive markets and liberal policies their due; they've 
>> produced dramatic expansions in access and will continue to do so if 
>> handled right. Be intelligent about when you need to intervene, and how, 
>> and when you don't. That's all.
>>
>> And to anticipate the inevitable incantation that markets don't do 
>> everything or aren't perfect, well, yeah. Who said they were?
>>
>> (well I guess we are closer to consensus than I figured after all ;-)
>>
>> MG
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
>> Sent: April 16, 2008 3:18 AM
>> To: McTim; governance at lists.cpsr.org; Michael Gurstein
>> Subject: RE: [governance] rights based approach to the Internet
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Michael Gurstein >> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The problem Milton (and McTim) is that I don't think anyone
>> believes in
>> > > that kind of incantatory market fundamentalism
>>
>> No, what we're dealing with in your case is a kind of incantatory 
>> anti-market fundamentalism, something that folks in civil society should 
>> have moved beyond in 1991, if not sooner. But old habits die hard, which 
>> is why I make an issue of it on this list.
>>
>> I'm perfectly willing to entertain policy interventions in the market 
>> when beneficial. But let's give competitive markets and liberal policies 
>> their due; they've produced dramatic expansions in access and will 
>> continue to do so if handled right. Be intelligent about when you need 
>> to intervene, and how, and when you don't. That's all.
>>
>> And to anticipate the inevitable incantation that markets don't do 
>> everything or aren't perfect, well, yeah. Who said they were?
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> 


-- 
J'utilise la version gratuíte de SPAMfighter pour utilisateurs privés.
Ce programme a supprimé12751 d'e-mails spam à ce jour.
Les utilisateurs qui paient n'ont pas ce message dans leurse-mails.
Obtenez la version gratuite de SPAMfighter ici: http://www.spamfighter.com/lfr



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités 
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080417/8ab804df/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance