<div>Salut Jean Louis</div> <div> </div> <div>C'est Rabia de ENDA TM : nous nous sommes rencontrés qq fois et croisé sur des listes.</div> <div>J'ai souri à ta remarque , mais ne pourrions nous pas intervenir un peu plus sur le débat de fond.</div> <div>Je vais commencer car il y a trop de banalités entendues sur le "marché".</div> <div>Amitiés cordiales</div> <div>Rabia<BR><BR><B><I>jlfullsack <jlfullsack@wanadoo.fr></I></B> a écrit :</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Dear Avri<BR>I do hope you know a lot more in economics than in italian politics. <BR>However, Tremonti is well known and not only by insiders. He was the <BR>"economist" in both the former Berlusconi's gouvenrments, with the <BR>"succcess" You (should) know.<BR>Best<BR>Jean-Louis Fullsack<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: "Avri Doria" <AVRI@PSG.COM><BR>To: "Governance Caucus"
<GOVERNANCE@LISTS.CPSR.ORG><BR>Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:56 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [governance] rights based approach to the Internet<BR><BR><BR>> Hi,<BR>><BR>> not that i want to get n the middle of this 20th century argument, but i <BR>> read an interesting line in a letter to the Editor of the Financial Times <BR>> today (oh no, what am i admitting) by Giulio Tremonti (an Italian <BR>> politician - don't know what his role is thse days) in defense of <BR>> accusations of protectionism:<BR>><BR>> "market if possible, state if necessary"<BR>><BR>> Now i don't now if i agree with much of what he says, as his letter is <BR>> all i have ever read of his, but this seems to be a reasonable position <BR>> at first blush.<BR>><BR>> And in today's world it looks like the market is being effective in some <BR>> places, but some places need more help then the market is likely to give. <BR>> And since (fortunately or
unfortunately depending on your viewpoint) we <BR>> have states and collections of states and associations of states ... , <BR>> they might as well be asked to do something useful for the people.<BR>><BR>> a.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On 16 Apr 2008, at 11:47, Michael Gurstein wrote:<BR>>> No, what we're dealing with in your case is a kind of incantatory <BR>>> anti-market fundamentalism, something that folks in civil society should <BR>>> have moved beyond in 1991 1930, if not sooner. But old habits die hard, <BR>>> which is why I make an issue of it on this list.<BR>>><BR>>> I'm perfectly willing to entertain policy market interventions in the <BR>>> market in support of public policy goods when beneficial. But let's I'll <BR>>> give competitive markets and liberal policies their due; they've <BR>>> produced dramatic expansions in access and will continue to do so if <BR>>> handled right. Be
intelligent about when you need to intervene, and how, <BR>>> and when you don't. That's all.<BR>>><BR>>> And to anticipate the inevitable incantation that markets don't do <BR>>> everything or aren't perfect, well, yeah. Who said they were?<BR>>><BR>>> (well I guess we are closer to consensus than I figured after all ;-)<BR>>><BR>>> MG<BR>>><BR>>> -----Original Message-----<BR>>> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@syr.edu]<BR>>> Sent: April 16, 2008 3:18 AM<BR>>> To: McTim; governance@lists.cpsr.org; Michael Gurstein<BR>>> Subject: RE: [governance] rights based approach to the Internet<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>>> ><BR>>> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Michael Gurstein <GURSTEIN@GMAIL.COM<BR>>> > wrote:<BR>>> > ><BR>>> > > The problem Milton (and McTim) is that I don't think
anyone<BR>>> believes in<BR>>> > > that kind of incantatory market fundamentalism<BR>>><BR>>> No, what we're dealing with in your case is a kind of incantatory <BR>>> anti-market fundamentalism, something that folks in civil society should <BR>>> have moved beyond in 1991, if not sooner. But old habits die hard, which <BR>>> is why I make an issue of it on this list.<BR>>><BR>>> I'm perfectly willing to entertain policy interventions in the market <BR>>> when beneficial. But let's give competitive markets and liberal policies <BR>>> their due; they've produced dramatic expansions in access and will <BR>>> continue to do so if handled right. Be intelligent about when you need <BR>>> to intervene, and how, and when you don't. That's all.<BR>>><BR>>> And to anticipate the inevitable incantation that markets don't do <BR>>> everything or aren't perfect, well, yeah. Who said
they were?<BR>>><BR>>> ____________________________________________________________<BR>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>>> governance@lists.cpsr.org<BR>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>>> governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org<BR>>><BR>>> For all list information and functions, see:<BR>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance<BR>><BR>> ____________________________________________________________<BR>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>> governance@lists.cpsr.org<BR>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>> governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org<BR>><BR>> For all list information and functions, see:<BR>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance<BR>><BR>> <BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>J'utilise la version gratuíte de SPAMfighter pour utilisateurs privés.<BR>Ce programme a supprimé12751 d'e-mails spam à ce
jour.<BR>Les utilisateurs qui paient n'ont pas ce message dans leurse-mails.<BR>Obtenez la version gratuite de SPAMfighter ici: http://www.spamfighter.com/lfr<BR><BR><BR><BR>____________________________________________________________<BR>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>governance@lists.cpsr.org<BR>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org<BR><BR>For all list information and functions, see:<BR>http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> __________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités <br>http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail