[governance] Substantive issues in CIR: speakers for IGF

[Karl Auerbach]

Milton L Mueller wrote:
> 
> As suggested in my last post, it makes little sense to discuss speakers 
> without a clear idea of what is to be spoken about.
> Here's a quick taxonomy of cIr issues:

I'd add end-to-end principle in the sense that the internet, if it to 
really support edge driven deployment of applications, needs to have 
some means to assure (not guarantee) to users that they can obtain 
(perhaps involving the transfer of some money and the availability of 
adequate resources) the end-to-end service quality needed to support 
whatever application they want to deploy.

(I have trouble expressing this thought with clarity.  I do not believe 
that the net has infinite resources or that applications that require 
fast, low jitter, or fat pipes ought to get a free ride at the expense 
of others.  The picture in my head is of someone, let's say a national 
government of a "southern" nation, who wants to deploy a service, such 
as international VoIP, and is willing to pay for adequate service to the 
"northern" countries.  The governance issue is how that request can be 
made and how providers can interact to accommodate it.)

		--karl--
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance