ALAC issues (was: Re: [governance] Innovation)

[Veni Markovski]

At 11:49 11/26/2007  -0800, Bret wrote:

>To solve this, the ALAC could (a) abandon the organizational model
>and move to an individual membership model; or (b) asks organizations
>to appoint one member from the ALS to serve as liaison to the RALO,
>but free him or her to act in a personal capacity, not as a
>representative of the organization. I'm sure there are more
>possibilities as well.


Bret,
I think that a way to deal with this is to creat an AL mailing list, 
which will be purely for AL-related issues; no personal mails, no 
wasting of time, etc., and then the liaison we can elect to represent 
ISOC-Bulgaria would be able to really spend some (little) time there.
At the moment it is very difficult to find someone who will be able 
to spend enormous amounts of time reading through the e-mails.
Interestingly enough, the discussion about improving the ALAC model 
is taking place on the... governance list, not in the AL lists ;-)

veni 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance