[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Mr. Robert Guerra]

Veni:

You have been posting a lot of message on this list recently.

As you are now a member of ICANN's staff, there is a key question  
that I and no doubt others are likely asking -  Are you speaking on  
behalf of the organization, or are replying in your own personal  
capacity ?

I ask, as it will help me (and likely others) appropriately frame our  
responses both on this list and in other fora.

ref: http://icann.org/general/staff.html


regards,

Robert
---
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377



On 14-May-07, at 9:07 AM, Veni Markovski wrote:

> At 08:51 5/14/2007  -0400, Mr. Robert Guerra wrote:
>
>>   Allow 8 to 12 weeks for responses ╜ and, just as importantly,
>> allow enough time between the end of the consultation and the formal
>> discussion of the results to distil the responses and summarise them
>> in a way that is can easily comprehensible. Where a consultation
>> takes place over a holiday, remember to allow extra response time (up
>> to an additional four weeks).
>
>
> btw, Robert, that would be a good point to talk about the IGC, too.  
> Because, if ICANN is to accept the OECD rules for discussions, that  
> should be valid for the constituencies, as well, including this group.
> Let's also not forget that the OECD members include only some  
> countries, and it's probably not by accident. It's also good to  
> point, that within ICANN there's at least the GAC, that takes  
> decisions only when they meet, not by e-mail. And I don't see any  
> suggestions from the IGC for audio-recording the GAC meetings. I  
> wonder why? Is it because, if the IGC tells the GAC what to do, the  
> GAC might tell the IGC where to go?
>
> As for the timeline...
> We work mainly online. We for sure could discuss something within a  
> month. The very fact how many people spent time on this list to  
> write down things, which are irelevant for the RFC, but very  
> relevant to prove that I am not right, is a sign that clearly  
> people have time.
>
> I don't understand why the same people, who spend so much time in  
> sending thoughts about life, universe, and everything else, can not  
> and would not send their contribution to an RFC. After all, they  
> almost do that in this list.
>
> veni
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance