[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law froomkin at law.miami.edu
Mon May 14 09:45:13 EDT 2007


Incidentally, Veni, I don't belive you ever replied to my question about 
who if anyone in the ICANN space has paid you since you left the Board.

That would be a useful form of transparency and requires no action by 
others.

On Mon, 14 May 2007, Veni Markovski wrote:

> At 08:51 5/14/2007  -0400, Mr. Robert Guerra wrote:
>
>>   Allow 8 to 12 weeks for responses ? and, just as importantly,
>> allow enough time between the end of the consultation and the formal
>> discussion of the results to distil the responses and summarise them
>> in a way that is can easily comprehensible. Where a consultation
>> takes place over a holiday, remember to allow extra response time (up
>> to an additional four weeks).
>
>
> btw, Robert, that would be a good point to talk about the IGC, too. Because, 
> if ICANN is to accept the OECD rules for discussions, that should be valid 
> for the constituencies, as well, including this group.
> Let's also not forget that the OECD members include only some countries, and 
> it's probably not by accident. It's also good to point, that within ICANN 
> there's at least the GAC, that takes decisions only when they meet, not by 
> e-mail. And I don't see any suggestions from the IGC for audio-recording the 
> GAC meetings. I wonder why? Is it because, if the IGC tells the GAC what to 
> do, the GAC might tell the IGC where to go?
>
> As for the timeline...
> We work mainly online. We for sure could discuss something within a month. 
> The very fact how many people spent time on this list to write down things, 
> which are irelevant for the RFC, but very relevant to prove that I am not 
> right, is a sign that clearly people have time.
>
> I don't understand why the same people, who spend so much time in sending 
> thoughts about life, universe, and everything else, can not and would not 
> send their contribution to an RFC. After all, they almost do that in this 
> list.
>
> veni
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>

-- 
http://www.icannwatch.org   Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list