[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Veni Markovski]

At 08:51 5/14/2007  -0400, Mr. Robert Guerra wrote:

>   Allow 8 to 12 weeks for responses ╜ and, just as importantly,
>allow enough time between the end of the consultation and the formal
>discussion of the results to distil the responses and summarise them
>in a way that is can easily comprehensible. Where a consultation
>takes place over a holiday, remember to allow extra response time (up
>to an additional four weeks).


btw, Robert, that would be a good point to talk 
about the IGC, too. Because, if ICANN is to 
accept the OECD rules for discussions, that 
should be valid for the constituencies, as well, including this group.
Let's also not forget that the OECD members 
include only some countries, and it's probably 
not by accident. It's also good to point, that 
within ICANN there's at least the GAC, that takes 
decisions only when they meet, not by e-mail. And 
I don't see any suggestions from the IGC for 
audio-recording the GAC meetings. I wonder why? 
Is it because, if the IGC tells the GAC what to 
do, the GAC might tell the IGC where to go?

As for the timeline...
We work mainly online. We for sure could discuss 
something within a month. The very fact how many 
people spent time on this list to write down 
things, which are irelevant for the RFC, but very 
relevant to prove that I am not right, is a sign 
that clearly people have time.

I don't understand why the same people, who spend 
so much time in sending thoughts about life, 
universe, and everything else, can not and would 
not send their contribution to an RFC. After all, 
they almost do that in this list.

veni

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance