[governance] IGC statement to IGF MAG - Yea -Lee w Mcknight

[dina]

Lee McKnight <LMcKnigh at syr.edu> wrote:  I support the text as is, and the titles as they are - I still don;t get why we're afraid to say 'ICANN' in public. 

Lee

Prof. Lee W. McKnight
School of Information Studies
Syracuse University
+1-315-443-6891office
+1-315-278-4392 mobile

>>> jeanette at wzb.eu 5/9/2007 1:38 PM >>>
I support the text and Mawaki's suggestion regarding the header of no 2.

jeanette

Mawaki Chango wrote:
> I support.
> I'd advise though to remove ICANN from the heading 2, but not
> from the text. Instead of :
> 
> "(2) ICANN and Core Internet Resources"
> we could have
> "(2) Core Internet Resources and current governance
> institutions"
> or a variant of that.
> 
> Mawaki
> 
> --- Carlos Afonso wrote:
> 
>> No kiss of death -- we will protest! We will not just send the
>> proposal 
>> and wait... I assume we are engaged in disseminating and
>> lobbying for 
>> our positions in our constituencies (and, in some cases, with
>> our 
>> governments as well). In any case, we can negotiate a word
>> replacement 
>> (meaning the same, of course) later on in the actual debate.
>> We can 
>> replace, for example, "ICANN" with "core resources such as the
>>
>> administration/governance of names, numbers and protocols..."
>> :)
>>
>> --c.a.
>>
>> DRAKE William wrote:
>>> Milton Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>>> I fully agree with Carlos, both about delivering it now,
>> and about the
>>>> title. Thanks, Parminder for putting it together. 
>>> Has there been a formal consensus call, and that's what
>> we're responding 
>>> to here? If so what's the time frame?
>>>
>>> I'm a yes on both of the above, although it occurs to me
>> that there was 
>>> never any follow up discussion on Adam's argument that
>> framing #2 in 
>>> terms of ICANN rather than just core resources would be the
>> kiss of 
>>> death mAG-wise. But as the clock is running down and we
>> have no 
>>> alternative language to consider, I guess we'll just see how
>> it goes, 
>>> assuming the proposal gets through the IGC process.

>>> Cheers,
>>> Bill

>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org 
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org 

>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 

>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Carlos A. Afonso
>> diretor de planejamento
>> Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor - Rits
>> http://www.rits.org.br 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


 
---------------------------------
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070510/a69d19bc/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070510/a69d19bc/attachment.txt>