[governance] AW: [Expression] Fwd: Re: [Privacy-coalition] IGF: workshop proposals?

Kleinw├Ąchter, Wolfgang wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de
Mon Jun 18 11:51:55 EDT 2007


There was also a discussion to have a workshop on "Censorship as a Trade Barrier?". Probably this could be discussed in the below mentioned context. Or we could have a workshop with several parts.
 
Regards
 
Wolfgang
 
 
________________________________

Von: expression-bounces at ipjustice.org im Auftrag von Christian Moeller
Gesendet: Mo 18.06.2007 17:35
An: expression at ipjustice.org
Betreff: [Expression] Fwd: Re: [Privacy-coalition] IGF: workshop proposals?



Dear all,
let me forward a mail Malcolm sent to the Privacy Coalition mailing list - apologies for cross posting.

When it comes to workshops I like the idea to have a workshop on 'Freedom of expression as a security measure'.

This is just to add another topic to the proposed ICANN-DNS theme.

I am looking forward to your comments,
best regards,
Christian



>>> Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> 15/06/2007 10:48 >>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

karen banks wrote:
> -The balance of privacy rights and freedom of expression with security
> needs.

Actually, Karen, I don't like the framing of this last bullet much: the
"balance" word is too often a codeword for "why we need to give up
individual rights in the name of collective security".

I'd rather be promoting the idea of privacy-supporting security
techniques (e.g. how the much maligned pre-paid debit cards enable
online transactions without identify theft, why giving out our personal
data unnecessarily puts it at risk of security breaches etc etc).

As for freedom of expression, when we're told to "balance" security
interests by censoring certain views, it needs to be said that this is
exactly what leads to terrorism. This is not only because of the sense
of grievance censorship creates or because of the (often spurious)
legitimacy censorship appears to confer on the censored opinions, but
also because censorship cuts off the option of legitimate democratic
alternatives. In a more "e-crime" context, banning the distribution of
tools that might help hackers (as the UK has done, and the whole of
Europe is now considering) will only harm the legitimate security
professionals who use and study them, not the criminals.

So as a counter-suggestion (I think they're two different issues):

- - Privacy as a security measure
- - Freedom of expression as a security measure

Malcolm.

Speaking above for myself, not for my employer.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPT 2.6.2.1 by EQUIPMENTE.DE
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org <http://enigmail.mozdev.org/> 

iD8DBQFGclJQ8eI1VdeGp60RAgOuAKDf8ts3oRpz7JRgliULbfADx5qeTQCfRYld
xNXhkuRPFMLF0dN3B7AmfWw=
=DFbu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Privacy-coalition mailing list
Privacy-coalition at lists.apc.org
http://lists.apc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/privacy-coalition


_______________________________________________

You are subscribed as: %(user_address)s

To be removed from this list send an email to Expression-request at ipjustice.org with the subject "unsubscribe" and you will be removed.

Or - click on this:
mailto:Expression-request at ipjustice.org?subject=unsubscribe

To change your options:
%(user_optionsurl)s

Expression mailing list
Expression at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/expression


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list