[governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team

[Rishi Chawla]

Dear Izumi,

I agree with you on this. It should be (b). If the member has not voted he
will give a declaration that he subscribes to the charter. If he has voted
in negative earlier, his declaration would over-ride his earlier vote.

I suggest the delaration should start with the phrase "Notwithstanding
anything communicated earlier ....... or Notwithstanding the position taken
during the voing process, I undertake to subscribe / support the CS-IGC
Charter"

Rishi Chawla
www.ictpolicy.org
New Delhi, India


-----Original Message-----
From: Izumi AIZU [mailto:iza at anr.org]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:31 PM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Rishi Chawla
Subject: Re: [governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team


Dear Rishi,

Thank you for the clarification question.

There can be two interpretations:
a) s/he has subscribed to the Charter - voted YES - when we adopted it.
b) s/he will make clear to subscribe/support the Carter, irrespective
of the vote

I thought it is b), but we at Nomcom have not defined it (yet).  We
should and we will.  What is your opinion?

Thanks,

izumi

2007/1/8, Rishi Chawla <rishi at gipi.org.in>:
> Dear Izumi,
>
> Regarding point A) Definition of Member - The current definition means
that
> those members of the CS-IGC who have not subscribed to the charter are not
> eligible for being part of Appeal team. Is this the intent?
>
> Regards
>
> Rishi Chawla
> www.ictpolicy.org
> New Delhi, India
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi AIZU [mailto:aizu at anr.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:04 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: [governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
>
>
> Dear list,
>
> A Happy New Year to all!
>
> As announced in the time line attached at the end of this e-mail,
> Nomcom for Appeals Team would like to propose the following
> as the criteria for selecting the Appeals Team members.
>
> We tried to be as simple as possible, but also like to convey our ideas
> clearly.
> If you have any comment, suggestions or questions, please put them on
> this list. The criteria below is close to final, but if we think
> additional suggestions make more sense, we will incorporate them.
>
> In the mean time, we will send out the Call for Nomination tomorrow,
> so that people can start to volunteer. Upon closing the nomination on
> Jan 21, which is our mutual challenge, Nomcom will begin the selection
> process. So, we should fix the criteria before starting the selection
> work. Please get ready to nominate as many good candidates as
> possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> izumi
>
> -----------------------
> Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
>
> A) Qualified IGC member
> Appeals team should be Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (CS
> IGC) members.
>
> Anyone who have subscribed to the IGC Charter and subscribed to the
> IGC caucus mailing list for 2 months prior to the announcement of the
> appeals team Nomcom process is eligible to be a candidate. (The Nomcom
> process started on November 20th 2006.)
>
> B) Qualifications
> Nomcom will primarily select persons based on their knowledge and
> experience of issues faced by the caucus and their neutrality.
>
> The successful candidate should be a person with thoughtful and
> unbiased consideration and have a stated (and demonstrated) commitment
> to consultation and dialogue with the community.
>
> C) Diversity and balance
> Appeal Team collectively should have good diversity and balance. The
> attributes to be considered include, but not limited to:
>  - Geographic and cultural diversity
>  - Gender
>  - Age
>  - Skill set and knowledge
>  - Disability
>
> These will be treated as a goal, but not as the absolute requirement.
>
> D) Others
> To avoid capture, no more than one employee/representative of a
> particular organization should serve on the Appeal Team at any given
> time.
>
> -- end --
>
> For your reference, the time line announced is as follows:
>
> 1. Discuss and agree with the criteria and selection method for Appeal
Team
>  - by Jan 8
>
> 2. Send out "Call for Appeal Team"  - Jan 9
>
> 3. Receive and review applications/nominations  - Jan 21
>
> 4. Make final selection - Jan 29
>
> 5. Prepare report (Chair) - Jan 30
>
> 6. Announce the result - Jan 31
>
> 7. Publish the Report and dissolve  - Jan 31
>
> --
>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
>
>             Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>             Kumon Center, Tama University
>                             * * * * *
>              << Writing the Future of the History >>
>                               www.anr.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>


--
                      >> Izumi Aizu <<

             Institute for HyperNetwork Society
             Kumon Center, Tama University
                             * * * * *
              << Writing the Future of the History >>
                               www.anr.org

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance