[governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team

[Avri Doria]

hi,

i don't think you have any way to ascertain that someone voted yes on  
the charter vote.  if can be ascertained _that_ they voted on the  
charter vote or the coordinator vote which means they self identified  
as members, but now how they voted.  also it can be ascertained that  
someone was a member of the list by a certain date.

a.

On 8 jan 2007, at 04.05, Izumi AIZU wrote:

> Dear Rishi,
>
> Thank you for the clarification question.
>
> There can be two interpretations:
> a) s/he has subscribed to the Charter - voted YES - when we adopted  
> it.
> b) s/he will make clear to subscribe/support the Carter, irrespective
> of the vote
>
> I thought it is b), but we at Nomcom have not defined it (yet).  We
> should and we will.  What is your opinion?
>
> Thanks,
>
> izumi
>
> 2007/1/8, Rishi Chawla <rishi at gipi.org.in>:
>> Dear Izumi,
>>
>> Regarding point A) Definition of Member - The current definition  
>> means that
>> those members of the CS-IGC who have not subscribed to the charter  
>> are not
>> eligible for being part of Appeal team. Is this the intent?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rishi Chawla
>> www.ictpolicy.org
>> New Delhi, India
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Izumi AIZU [mailto:aizu at anr.org]
>> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:04 PM
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> Subject: [governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
>>
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> A Happy New Year to all!
>>
>> As announced in the time line attached at the end of this e-mail,
>> Nomcom for Appeals Team would like to propose the following
>> as the criteria for selecting the Appeals Team members.
>>
>> We tried to be as simple as possible, but also like to convey our  
>> ideas
>> clearly.
>> If you have any comment, suggestions or questions, please put them on
>> this list. The criteria below is close to final, but if we think
>> additional suggestions make more sense, we will incorporate them.
>>
>> In the mean time, we will send out the Call for Nomination tomorrow,
>> so that people can start to volunteer. Upon closing the nomination on
>> Jan 21, which is our mutual challenge, Nomcom will begin the  
>> selection
>> process. So, we should fix the criteria before starting the selection
>> work. Please get ready to nominate as many good candidates as
>> possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> izumi
>>
>> -----------------------
>> Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
>>
>> A) Qualified IGC member
>> Appeals team should be Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (CS
>> IGC) members.
>>
>> Anyone who have subscribed to the IGC Charter and subscribed to the
>> IGC caucus mailing list for 2 months prior to the announcement of the
>> appeals team Nomcom process is eligible to be a candidate. (The  
>> Nomcom
>> process started on November 20th 2006.)
>>
>> B) Qualifications
>> Nomcom will primarily select persons based on their knowledge and
>> experience of issues faced by the caucus and their neutrality.
>>
>> The successful candidate should be a person with thoughtful and
>> unbiased consideration and have a stated (and demonstrated)  
>> commitment
>> to consultation and dialogue with the community.
>>
>> C) Diversity and balance
>> Appeal Team collectively should have good diversity and balance. The
>> attributes to be considered include, but not limited to:
>>  - Geographic and cultural diversity
>>  - Gender
>>  - Age
>>  - Skill set and knowledge
>>  - Disability
>>
>> These will be treated as a goal, but not as the absolute requirement.
>>
>> D) Others
>> To avoid capture, no more than one employee/representative of a
>> particular organization should serve on the Appeal Team at any given
>> time.
>>
>> -- end --
>>
>> For your reference, the time line announced is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Discuss and agree with the criteria and selection method for  
>> Appeal Team
>>  - by Jan 8
>>
>> 2. Send out "Call for Appeal Team"  - Jan 9
>>
>> 3. Receive and review applications/nominations  - Jan 21
>>
>> 4. Make final selection - Jan 29
>>
>> 5. Prepare report (Chair) - Jan 30
>>
>> 6. Announce the result - Jan 31
>>
>> 7. Publish the Report and dissolve  - Jan 31
>>
>> --
>>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
>>
>>             Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>>             Kumon Center, Tama University
>>                             * * * * *
>>              << Writing the Future of the History >>
>>                               www.anr.org
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
>
>             Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>             Kumon Center, Tama University
>                             * * * * *
>              << Writing the Future of the History >>
>                               www.anr.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance