[governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team

[Rishi Chawla]

Dear Izumi,

Regarding point A) Definition of Member - The current definition means that
those members of the CS-IGC who have not subscribed to the charter are not
eligible for being part of Appeal team. Is this the intent?

Regards

Rishi Chawla
www.ictpolicy.org
New Delhi, India

-----Original Message-----
From: Izumi AIZU [mailto:aizu at anr.org]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:04 PM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: [governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team


Dear list,

A Happy New Year to all!

As announced in the time line attached at the end of this e-mail,
Nomcom for Appeals Team would like to propose the following
as the criteria for selecting the Appeals Team members.

We tried to be as simple as possible, but also like to convey our ideas
clearly.
If you have any comment, suggestions or questions, please put them on
this list. The criteria below is close to final, but if we think
additional suggestions make more sense, we will incorporate them.

In the mean time, we will send out the Call for Nomination tomorrow,
so that people can start to volunteer. Upon closing the nomination on
Jan 21, which is our mutual challenge, Nomcom will begin the selection
process. So, we should fix the criteria before starting the selection
work. Please get ready to nominate as many good candidates as
possible.

Thanks,

izumi

-----------------------
Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team

A) Qualified IGC member
Appeals team should be Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (CS
IGC) members.

Anyone who have subscribed to the IGC Charter and subscribed to the
IGC caucus mailing list for 2 months prior to the announcement of the
appeals team Nomcom process is eligible to be a candidate. (The Nomcom
process started on November 20th 2006.)

B) Qualifications
Nomcom will primarily select persons based on their knowledge and
experience of issues faced by the caucus and their neutrality.

The successful candidate should be a person with thoughtful and
unbiased consideration and have a stated (and demonstrated) commitment
to consultation and dialogue with the community.

C) Diversity and balance
Appeal Team collectively should have good diversity and balance. The
attributes to be considered include, but not limited to:
  - Geographic and cultural diversity
  - Gender
  - Age
  - Skill set and knowledge
  - Disability

These will be treated as a goal, but not as the absolute requirement.

D) Others
To avoid capture, no more than one employee/representative of a
particular organization should serve on the Appeal Team at any given
time.

-- end --

For your reference, the time line announced is as follows:

1. Discuss and agree with the criteria and selection method for Appeal Team
  - by Jan 8

2. Send out "Call for Appeal Team"  - Jan 9

3. Receive and review applications/nominations  - Jan 21

4. Make final selection - Jan 29

5. Prepare report (Chair) - Jan 30

6. Announce the result - Jan 31

7. Publish the Report and dissolve  - Jan 31

--
                      >> Izumi Aizu <<

             Institute for HyperNetwork Society
             Kumon Center, Tama University
                             * * * * *
              << Writing the Future of the History >>
                               www.anr.org
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance