[governance] Statement for Feb 13, version 2

[l.d.misek-falkoff]

Greetings,

Could the ICANN matter be embedded in a either slightly (or even greater)
general framework?
Reflecting Relationship Issues?  Matters of domain and scope, in IGF
contexts and venues?

Best wishes, Linda.
Dr. Linda D. Misek-Falkoff
For I.D. here: Communications Coordination Committee for the U.N., and
Independent Observer.


On 2/11/07, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On the issue of mentioning (or not) that ICANN related issues should be
> taken up by the IGF - as per the precise formulation suggested by Vittorio
> below - I am in favor of its inclusion. I request more comments on this
> issue which will help Vittorio to decide if sufficient consensus exists.
> Parminder
>
> ( I apologize for this sudden flurry of emails while not taking part in
> the
> discussion for quite some time. I am in an area with extremely poor
> connectivity, and could not connect earlier)
>
> ________________________________________________
> Parminder Jeet Singh
> IT for Change, Bangalore
> Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities
> Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890
> Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055
> www.ITforChange.net
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Malcolm [mailto:Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:08 AM
> > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > Subject: Re: [governance] Statement for Feb 13, version 2
> >
> > Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > > Now to make things even clearer, this is the text that I would add,
> > > building on Adam's initial suggestion (more suggestions welcome), if
> > > consensus was for "yes": "We think that, as per comma (j) of the IGF
> > > mandate, the legal nature and working structure of ICANN should be
> among
> > > the matters discussed in Rio, as long as they do not prevent the IGF
> > > from paying adequate attention to all the other themes.". This would
> > > replace the part where we say there is no consensus among us on this,
> > > while I'd still keep the bit on making the enhanced cooperation
> process
> > > more transparent.
> >
> > I am mildly in favour.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
> > Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
> > host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070211/abcfe209/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070211/abcfe209/attachment.txt>