<div>Greetings,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Could the ICANN matter be embedded in a either slightly (or even greater) general framework?</div>
<div>Reflecting Relationship Issues? Matters of domain and scope, in IGF contexts and venues?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best wishes, Linda.</div>
<div>Dr. Linda D. Misek-Falkoff</div>
<div>For I.D. here: Communications Coordination Committee for the U.N., and Independent Observer.<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Parminder</b> <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>On the issue of mentioning (or not) that ICANN related issues should be<br>taken up by the IGF - as per the precise formulation suggested by Vittorio
<br>below - I am in favor of its inclusion. I request more comments on this<br>issue which will help Vittorio to decide if sufficient consensus exists.<br>Parminder<br><br>( I apologize for this sudden flurry of emails while not taking part in the
<br>discussion for quite some time. I am in an area with extremely poor<br>connectivity, and could not connect earlier)<br><br>________________________________________________<br>Parminder Jeet Singh<br>IT for Change, Bangalore
<br>Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities<br>Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890<br>Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055<br><a href="http://www.ITforChange.net">www.ITforChange.net</a><br><br>> -----Original Message-----
<br>> From: Jeremy Malcolm [mailto:<a href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a>]<br>> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:08 AM<br>> To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org
</a><br>> Subject: Re: [governance] Statement for Feb 13, version 2<br>><br>> Vittorio Bertola wrote:<br>> > Now to make things even clearer, this is the text that I would add,<br>> > building on Adam's initial suggestion (more suggestions welcome), if
<br>> > consensus was for "yes": "We think that, as per comma (j) of the IGF<br>> > mandate, the legal nature and working structure of ICANN should be among<br>> > the matters discussed in Rio, as long as they do not prevent the IGF
<br>> > from paying adequate attention to all the other themes.". This would<br>> > replace the part where we say there is no consensus among us on this,<br>> > while I'd still keep the bit on making the enhanced cooperation process
<br>> > more transparent.<br>><br>> I am mildly in favour.<br>><br>> --<br>> Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com<br>> Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor<br>> host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk
-F! '{print $3}'<br>> ____________________________________________________________<br>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org
</a><br>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>><br>> For all list information and functions, see:
<br>> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org
</a><br><br>For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br></blockquote></div><br>