[governance] Re: ICANN taxes/fees
Peter Dambier
peter at echnaton.serveftp.com
Thu Feb 8 15:00:44 EST 2007
veni markovski wrote:
> At 12:31 PM 2/8/2007 -0500, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
> wrote:
>
>> Personal experience IS data. Even in academia...
>
>
> Sure - about one or two TLDs, or may be dozen. But I see nothing in
> wrong in saying, "some of the TLDs", instead the unsupported with data
> "many (probably most". The fact that someone says that most of the TLDs
> have no 24x7 staff does not make this (that most of them have no staff)
> a fact. Or you disagree again, just for the sake of the argument, and
> regardless of the fact that so far no one has shown any data about the
> "most of the TLDs".
>
>
Just to help you a bit with numbers, I have started a scan over the
root.zone as published by a.root-servers.net.
I did find 65 errors. Most severe I think
host_error("BW.","DAISY.EE.UND.AC.ZA.","Host not found").
host_error("GM.","NS2.NIC.GM.","Host not found").
host_error("SO.","MERCURY.ML.ORG.","Host not found").
host_error("VA.","DXMON.CERN.CH.","Host not found").
They are using nameservers that do not even exist.
Next severe are things like
error("ET.","NS1.GIP.NET.","204.59.144.222","no response").
error("ET.","NS2.GIP.NET.","204.59.1.222","no response").
error("ET.","NS3.GIP.NET.","204.59.64.222","no response").
error("MM.","NS-MM.RIPE.NET.","193.0.12.151","no response").
error("MM.","NS.NET.MM.","202.153.125.17","no dns").
error("MM.","NS0.MPT.NET.MM.","203.81.64.20","no soa").
; <<>> DiG 9.4.0b4 <<>> -t any mm
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64525
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;mm. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
mm. 50718 IN NS ns-mm.ripe.net.
mm. 50718 IN NS ns.NET.mm.
mm. 50718 IN NS NS0.MPT.NET.mm.
;; Query time: 8 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.208.228#53(192.168.208.228)
;; WHEN: Thu Feb 8 20:55:03 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 91
For MM that means you cannot reach them at all.
I dont think they show 24 x 7 support but even if they had
I dont think ICANN would talk to them.
I see only the fellows who are showing errors. But I have seen
analyzing root-servers from different root groups e.g. the
Cesidian Root that you can run for a very long time without
maintainance. So I guess from 65 errors there might be some
50 domains with problems few of them with more than one error
but just as many of them with three errors. The domains with bad
maintainance should be about five times as many - that is 250.
ICANN has 265 domains excluding the root.
Take away NET, COM, ORG, AERO, INFO then only 5 ccTLDs
show 24 x 7 support. That is practically none.
Even if my reasoning is mostly guesswork it suggests there
are few ccTLDs that have 24 x 7 support and it is known
many of them even have outsourced DNS completely.
Kind regards
Peter and Karin Dambier
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Rimbacher-Strasse 16
D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
+49(6209)795-816 (Telekom)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: peter at echnaton.serveftp.com
mail: peter at peter-dambier.de
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
http://www.cesidianroot.com/
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list