[governance] What happened at the NARALO/ALAC/CCNSO?

[McTim]

On Dec 5, 2007 9:22 AM,  <yehudakatz at mailinator.com> wrote:
> Simply,
>
> Icann's Alac/Ralo system is just a placebo, my post was to illustrate for
> the General Manger (Kieran) that participation in the 'ground-up" position
> with Icann's system dose not work.
>
> And I would also add that Danny Younger was the GM's chosen example of how a
> person 'participates'.
>
> -
> Basically it shows the powerlessness of the User(s).
>
> This was a done-deal, done long ago, and those on the ALAC who were to
> safeguard our interest and also 'safeguard the process'
> ... were not there. Danny was basically told; 'Talk-to-the-Hand.'
>
> --
>
> >how do you tie spectrum allocation food fights up with
> >ICANN politics?
<snip>
>
> You tell me, In any part of the World today: How many Mobile Cell Phone Vendors
> do you see? pushing the gambit of mobile-devices & plans …
> Yea you bet their coming out your ears, and they all need a share of "spectrum
> allocation" too access "ip-base-content". And we haven't even begun to see the
> number of un-tethered-mobile-devices, yet to come. So long as they operate
> mobile-to-base or mobile-to-mobile there will be an IP NetPlex.
>
> You don't need any imagination to see that.

Perhaps, but it is a stretch of my imagination to tie any of the above
(pipes, content, data over wireless/mobile telephony) to ICANN.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance