[governance] Possible CS text on forum

[Jeanette Hofmann]

>>The last sentence ("Overlap or duplication with existing institutions
>>should be avoided") is misleading. It can be easily used as an excuse for
>>the US and other to say "IPR? Nay, this overlaps with WIPO!"
>>Can we just delete the last sentence? (Or put it into brackets - just
>>kidding). Or am I missing something here?
> 
> 
> I think what you are missing is the importance of the notion that many
> issues are dealt with in pre-existing fora.  There has to be some text
> that protects their turf IMO.
> 
> JH, I don't understand your response:
> 
> 
>>No, you don't. We have talked about this cross cutting issues several
>>times before.
> 
> 
> Are you agreeing with Ralf here?

Yes, sorry for being unclear. I meant to say, Ralf, you don't miss 
anything. We assume that the forum will deal with cross cutting issues.

jeanette
> 
> 
>>I also would like to express my doubts about the executive group. I
>>don't understand its function.
> 
> 
> I understand this bit, and I agree.  Not needed IMO and doesn't sound
> very bottum up to me.
> 
> Anything we build has got to be better than what we have now,
> especially for LDCs.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> nic-hdl:      TMCG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance