[governance] New version of WSIS CS statement: Two IG issues

[Avri Doria]

hi,

i am fine with either Bill's formulation or yours.  I think we will  
need to focus on the modalities in the near term, but in the long  
term, who knows.  It might be worth mentioning this to let people  
know that we really care about those modalities.

a.

On 30 nov 2005, at 13.00, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:

> 2. IG caucus participation: I like your wording but wonder whether we
> should be so specific about the working group we are discussing. Do we
> have already agreement on the scope of the working group? I am not
> convinced yet that the wg should solely focus on "modalities". So why
> not something like "...create a working group that will make
> recommendations on relevant aspects concerning the IGF".
>

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance