[governance] New version of WSIS CS statement: Two IG issues

[Avri Doria]

hi Vittorio,

i am hoping (i really need to get the proposed charter finished and  
sent out) to pull in people from further afield then just the IG  
caucus to work on the IGF modalities.

Having said that, of course while i am claiming the right to try and  
start another Wg with other interested individuals, i would never  
dream of denying anyone else that right.

a.


On 30 nov 2005, at 14.23, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> Avri Doria ha scritto:
>> hi,
>> i am fine with either Bill's formulation or yours.  I think we  
>> will  need to focus on the modalities in the near term, but in the  
>> long  term, who knows.  It might be worth mentioning this to let  
>> people  know that we really care about those modalities.
>
> I think we have to be very clear on whether we expect this to be  
> the only or at least the recommended place for CS groups that want  
> to discuss about the forum. In fact, I expect that there might be a  
> number of other caucuses and NGOs making suggestions about the  
> Forum modalities without going through our WG, and I think this  
> should be made clear as well (unless what we envisage is to prevent  
> this from happening, which however I would neither know how nor  
> like to do).
> -- 
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org] 
> <-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance