[governance] Ever more complicated rescheduling

[Izumi AIZU]

First, I would say OK and agree with either option.
But I prefer Thursday to Friday.

Seconde, I had a plan for Friday morning, but I can give that up. It's
not a big deal compared with our meeting.

Third, I think Wolfgang, I guess, has to leave on Thursday.
If not, sorry that is my wrong memory. And I also think
Thursday is better because we have so much to discuss,
and even inforally, if we cannot finish some details etc
by Thursday, we still have Friday for additional work,
and also some kind of feedback from those who are
not here, given they will be informed via list.

Thanks,

izumi


At 22:03 05/11/15 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>Dear caucus members,
>
>we are building up a tradition of changing our meeting times at the very
>last minute, I am quite aware of this sad fact!
>
>Since Adam is not able to attend on Thursday morning, we have now worked
>out two new options for a meeting:
>
>1. Thursday 2.30 until 5 pm
>2. Friday 10 am until 1 pm.
>
>All people I managed to talk to would be available at both times. The
>advantage of a meeting on Friday would be that we are not squeezed in to
>lots of other meetings. The disadvantage of the second option would be
>that we miss part of the CRIS meeting that takes place on that day.
>However, as I understand it the most relevant part of the CRIS event
>will be in the afternoon.
>
>Could I ask those who attend the caucus meeting in person for a _quick_
>show of hand so that we can agee on one of the two dates?
>
>thank you, Adam and Jeanette
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance