[governance] FW: suggested changes to chairs paper, paras 45 and 65

[Adam Peake (ajp@glocom.ac.jp)]

If the paragraph is re-opened we can try to use your suggestion. But I
think best to go with the original text while arguing for it to be
reopened.

Adam


On 11/6/05, Gurstein, Michael <gurstein at adm.njit.edu> wrote:
>
> My suggestions were purely stylistic so if the other one works
> tactically then go with it certainly...
>
> MG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Peake (ajp at glocom.ac.jp) [mailto:apeake at gmail.com]
> Sent: November 6, 2005 2:00 PM
> To: Gurstein, Michael
> Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: Re: [governance] suggested changes to chairs paper, paras 45
> and 65
>
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks, your text is an improvement.  But two things.  I think we have a
> better argument to say 'this is the text we submitted before and was
> ignored'. It's in the record of the prepcom so procedurally may be
> easier to accept.
>

 (rest deleted)

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance