[governance] "pre-eminent role"

[Ian Peter]

Vittorio -

Thanks for a good draft. On my first read, it’s a good start. I also agree
with Raul's two comments


Danny:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org 
> [mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> Sent: Sunday, 6 November 2005 1:46 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: [governance] "pre-eminent role"
> 
> I disagree with the stated principle:  "No single Government 
> or other stakeholder should have a pre-eminent role in 
> relation to international Internet governance".
> 

Perhaps in that case you should let us know which government or which
stakeholder should have a pre-eminent role,  and why that should be so at
the expense of the inputs of other governments and stakeholders. You might
also explain how that equates with the general idea of a multi-stakeholder
governance structure, or do you disagree with that principle as well?

I have read your defence of current practice - I disagree with it, but
irrespective of that I think the principle that no single government or
other stakeholder should have a pre-eminent role in relation to Internet
Governance is at the heart of  everything that most of us here see as
central to being able to support the evolution of ICANN.


Ian Peter

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: 5/11/2005
 


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance