[governance] Comments related to the WGIG report

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Raul Echeberria wrote:
> Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>- as an additional para:
>>>>

>>
>>I am not sure that the forum needs an executive.  i think a 
>>secretariat is enough to act as the facilitation that is the forum.  i 
>>am against recommending a formal organization
> 
> I strongly agree. In fact, I would not mention a secretariat either.

Raul, what's wrong with a secretariat? Somebody has to organize 
meetings, no?
As I said before, I agree Vittorio's point that the forum needs to focus 
on output. Otherwise nobody will take it serious. However, such a body 
cannot have any authority and should start very modestly. The forum 
needs to earn its reputation before it can grow and develop all sorts of 
functions and hierarchies.

jeanette

> 
> 
> Raúl
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance