[governance] Comments related to the WGIG report

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Hi, the discussion about one root versus multiple or parallel roots is 
probably older than the DNS itself. Most debates on this issue don't go 
anywhere.

I would very much appreciate if we could focus our attention on our 
response on the WGIG report. There are still many issues we havn't 
discussed properly. In Geneva we will again draft position papers. It 
would be so nice if the caucus could make up its mind on central issues 
such as the forum.

jeanette


Robert Guerra wrote:
> Carlos:
> 
> i'm not for change for the sake of change.
> 
> A more decentralized & distributed DNS system that doesn't get us  
> into multiple name-spaces and is more secure than the current regime  
> would be ideal - but is it possible? if so, how would the transition  
> occur?
> 
> if details are available, by all means point me to them.
> 
> regards
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 9-Aug-05, at 6:51 AM, Carlos Afonso wrote:
> 
> 
>>It is fascinating how the technical experts react to any "menace"  
>>to a current paradigm. The fact is that the mentioned RFC and  
>>several related others are precisely produced *under* the current  
>>paradigm. Like, if the Earth is flat and this is the hypothesis,  
>>the ensuing theorems will never deal with the logic of a round one.  
>>When is a Galileo going to show up and say "look, actually it is  
>>possible, and it will happen"?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance