[NCUC-DISCUSS] [bestbits] Re: [governance] list of important questions to be delivered to LOC before 27th meeting

[Renata Avila]

Hello everyone. I strongly suggest a quota approach. Geographical - gender
- minorities representation is necessary. For instance, the UK Gov already
announced they are sending a huge delegation. We need balance and
visibility of the global south. Not all regions and groups are well
represented in the current "created" spaces. I see the Brazilian meeting as
a key opportunity of participation. We should aim to break silos and
connect IG with other ongoing political struggles. Ample and meaningful
participation beyond the IG frequent travelers club is urgently needed to
revitalize the space.

Renata
On 26 Jan 2014 22:08, "Joana Varon" <joana at varonferraz.com> wrote:

> Very good point,  Nnenna.
>
> Dear all, for the record, in the sense of using all the paths we have,
> Adiel has just transmitted to the co-chairs of the EMC, Demi and Raul, the
> sets of questions we have compiled. So Marilia and Adam can have more
> support to push them as urgent matters as well.
>
> For the very tricky ones, I would suggest to bring a set of options to
> consult with the stakeholders.
>
> All the best and I wish you both, Adam and Marilia, a very inspired meeting
>
> Best
>
> Joana
> On 26 Jan 2014 14:24, "Nnenna Nwakanma" <nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I will tend to lean on a committee using an agreed set of criteria, one
>> being contribution during the prep process.
>> However, there is one thing that needs to be checked
>> ** the size of government delegations***
>>
>> How many people can be in an official delegation?
>>
>> Over the years, the IGF has been encouraging governments to add CS folks
>> to their delegations, and not  many countries have been doing that. So the
>> question here will be : "What will be the maximum size of an official
>> delegation?"
>>
>> N
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for that Norbert. And if anyone feels that there were older
>>> threads in our lists that were important to this present discussion, please
>>> link them here, or resend them. I am trying to map, but any help would be
>>> useful.
>>> Best
>>> Marília
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Next step would be the question of selection. So far I have informally
>>>> > tried to reach out to people and ask opinions. What I have collected
>>>> > so far comes down to three options. But there may be more, so please
>>>> > propose new ideas or comment on the ones below:
>>>> >
>>>> > - Bottom up self-selection process. Pro: more legitimacy. Con: some
>>>> > fear the burden would be too heavy for a nom-com.
>>>> > - First come first served. People who register would be accepted
>>>> > until the number of participants is reached. Pro: easier to handle.
>>>> > Con: some fear it could create distortions and lack of balance
>>>> > - Selection by a committee (not clear by which one), based on
>>>> > previously agreed criteria such as: balance between developind and
>>>> > developed regions, presenting contributions to the public
>>>> > consultation as pre-condition for on site participation, have
>>>> > attended at least 3 IGFs, etc. Pro: Middle-terms solution if criteria
>>>> > is agreed beforehand. Con: Not mentioned.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please, let me know if you have feelings or preferences about the
>>>> > above.
>>>>
>>>> APC has proposed that the selection of participants should be on the
>>>> basis of contributing substantively during the preparatory process.
>>>>
>>>> I support that proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Marília Maciel*
>>> Pesquisadora Gestora
>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>>>
>>> Researcher and Coordinator
>>> Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>>
>>> DiploFoundation associate
>>> www.diplomacy.edu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140127/e17cc924/attachment.htm>