process Re: [bestbits] [Meeting Report]: friday meeting with fadi et all

[Kivuva]

On 31 October 2013 10:14, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> If the meeting decided as new list is the best approach, then that's fine.
> But who will decide if an organization or individual is civil society, in
> the case of an individual are they civil-society enough.


This come be done through referrals and endorsement by existing members of
the list.

Had this discussion on and off since the start of WSIS, both for
> participation in CS generally and for individual caucus and working groups.
>  Very difficulty, can be time consuming and every so often controversial.
>  The kind of procedural rat-hole that often ties up the IGC and makes it so
> unproductive.  And of course the list will leak.
>
> Bestbits seems to have found a way to be productive.  Good.
>
> Apologies for raising the process stuff. I'd really like to hear about all
> the discussions about the Brazil/ICANN summit that went on on Bali.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits





______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131031/c60c6940/attachment.htm>