[bestbits] Joint civil society endorsements for London meeting of High-Level Panel
Marianne Franklin
m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk
Fri Nov 29 08:36:17 EST 2013
*1 from me. Thanks Nnenna
best
MF
On 29/11/2013 13:33, Nnenna Nwakanma wrote:
> Hi Jeremy, all
>
> I have nothing againt the two nominees. The whole part of 1Net, what
> is it doing on the HLP? These are two different issues. I went to the
> pad and canceled out the paragraph on 1Net, but there is still 1Net on
> the very first paragraph.
>
> I do NOT think this letter is clear. In such communications, the
> shorter the better. If HLP is mixed with 1Net, Fadi can decide to
> construe it the way he wants. One possible misunderstanding will be
> that the two are being proposed for the HLP and also for 1Net..
>
> My suggstion will be to have a 2 paragraph letter saying:
>
> 1. We had informed you that we wanted more CS representation on the HLP
> 2. We formed a joint committee of several CS networks
> 3. We have consulted as rapidly as possible to be able to have the
> suggested reps integrated in time for London
> 4. Here are the suggestions
>
> Just keep the communication to London and leave 1Net alone
>
>
> My 2 cents
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Anja Kovacs
> <anja at internetdemocracy.in <mailto:anja at internetdemocracy.in>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The two nominees have my full support, but again, I have
> considerable issues with the letter in which their nomination is
> supposed to be shared with ICANN - in fact so much so that I was
> wondering whether this was written in jest, to see if someone
> would pick up on these issues?
>
> In any case, just in case it wasn't in jest: I do not remember
> anyone ever claiming that the panel was a 1net panel. It was very
> clear that it emerged out of ICANN, and though some who are
> involved in 1net might have been consulted on it to a greater
> extent than others, that doesn't change this fundamental fact. The
> letter thus confuses issues, and by doing so, is unnecessarily
> antagonistic. More importantly, it therefore also gives the panel
> a weight that not all on this list (and on the IGC list, as far as
> I could see) feel it deserves - in fact, some are quite clear it
> does not, and the panel thus should not be sanctified in ways that
> have not been agreed on.
>
> There are also a few strange terms being used in the letter. As
> far as I know, the panel was never named the "CEO's High Level
> Panel". Also, if someone could guide me to a space where I can
> find out more about "multi-equal-stakeholderism" and its origins,
> I'd be grateful - first time I hear about this.
>
> In its current form, I find it quite unacceptable to send this.
>
> My 2 paise,
> Anja
>
>
>
>
> On 29 November 2013 10:52, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org
> <mailto:jeremy at ciroap.org>> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/13 13:18, Adam Peake wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks for this.
>>
>> I have a concern. But first could you please explain who was involved in the selection process, who from which organizations, what criteria considered, who were the candidates considered.
>>
>> My experience of trying to co-coordinate CS contributions to IG topics for a couple of years during the Tunis phase of WSIS and later involvement with the first couple of years of IGF, this just doesn't sit well with me.
>
> I will address this in the old thread (Re: [bestbits]
> Formation of a joint steering Committee - as received). This
> thread is not for process concerns, just for comments on the
> two names.
>
>
> --
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for
> consumers*
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
> Lumpur, Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599 <tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599>
>
> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement
> knowledge hub |
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
>
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org> |
> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
> <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
> *WARNING*: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly
> recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end.
> For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 <tel:%2B91%209899028053> | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in <http://www.internetdemocracy.in/>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
--
Professor Marianne Franklin
Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program
Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF)
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dept. of Media & Communications
New Cross, London SE14 6NW
Tel: +44 20 7919 7072
<m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>
@GloComm
https://twitter.com/GloComm
http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/
https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/
www.internetrightsandprinciples.org
@netrights
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131129/4490212c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list