[bestbits] Joint civil society endorsements for London meeting of High-Level Panel

[Nnenna Nwakanma]

Hi Jeremy, all

I have nothing againt the two nominees.   The whole part of 1Net, what is
it doing on the HLP? These are two different issues.  I went to the pad and
canceled out the paragraph on 1Net, but there is still 1Net on the  very
first paragraph.

I do NOT think this letter is clear. In such communications, the shorter
the better. If HLP  is mixed with 1Net, Fadi can decide to construe it the
way he wants. One possible misunderstanding will be that the two are being
proposed for the HLP and also for 1Net..

My suggstion will be to have a 2 paragraph letter saying:

   1. We had informed you that we wanted more CS representation on the HLP
   2. We formed a joint committee of several CS networks
   3. We have consulted as rapidly as possible to be able to  have the
   suggested reps integrated in time for London
   4. Here are the suggestions

Just keep the communication to London and leave 1Net alone


My 2 cents


N


On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Anja Kovacs <anja at internetdemocracy.in>wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> The two nominees have my full support, but again, I have considerable
> issues with the letter in which their nomination is supposed to be shared
> with ICANN - in fact so much so that I was wondering whether this was
> written in jest, to see if someone would pick up on these issues?
>
> In any case, just in case it wasn't in jest: I do not remember anyone ever
> claiming that the panel was a 1net panel. It was very clear that it emerged
> out of ICANN, and though some who are involved in 1net might have been
> consulted on it to a greater extent than others, that doesn't change this
> fundamental fact. The letter thus confuses issues, and by doing so, is
> unnecessarily antagonistic. More importantly, it therefore also gives the
> panel a weight that not all on this list (and on the IGC list, as far as I
> could see) feel it deserves - in fact, some are quite clear it does not,
> and the panel thus should not be sanctified in ways that have not been
> agreed on.
>
> There are also a few strange terms being used in the letter. As far as I
> know, the panel was never named the "CEO's High Level Panel". Also, if
> someone could guide me to a space where I can find out more about
> "multi-equal-stakeholderism" and its origins, I'd be grateful - first time
> I hear about this.
>
> In its current form, I find it quite unacceptable to send this.
>
> My 2 paise,
> Anja
>
>
>
>
> On 29 November 2013 10:52, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
>
>>  On 29/11/13 13:18, Adam Peake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks for this.
>>
>> I have a concern.  But first could you please explain who was involved in the selection process, who from which organizations, what criteria considered, who were the candidates considered.
>>
>> My experience of trying to co-coordinate CS contributions to IG topics for a couple of years during the Tunis phase of WSIS and later involvement with the first couple of years of IGF, this just doesn't sit well with me.
>>
>>
>> I will address this in the old thread (Re: [bestbits] Formation of a
>> joint steering Committee - as received).  This thread is not for process
>> concerns, just for comments on the two names.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm Senior Policy Officer Consumers International | the
>> global campaigning voice for consumers*
>> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
>> Malaysia
>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>>
>> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge
>> hub | http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
>>
>> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org |
>> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>>
>> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
>> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>
>> *WARNING*: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly
>> recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For
>> instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131129/3c0b45b1/attachment.htm>