[bestbits] Last day of WTPF - drafting concluding statement

[Nnenna Nwakanma]

Dear Michael

You were not the only one:

   1. Who made comments
   2. Who may have suggested edits
   3. Who was denied access at the beginning of plenary
   4. Who got an invite after lunch (30-40 minutes before plenary)

I was not in the original drafting committee because I am only
participating remotely..

The difference might have been that I have been closely following and most
of the views DO EMBODY already known and agreed principles.

Best


Nnenna


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>wrote:

> So, if you are going to deny access when a comment is made, close off
> discussion, and provide no response to a comment... Why bother to send the
> invitation at all... there being roughly 40 minutes from the invitation
> going out to my being denied further access to comment (I didn't make any
> intervention into the text... my comment being an attempt to get further
> context prior to attempting to make a comment in the text itself...
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:47 AM
> To: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
> Subject: RE: [bestbits] Last day of WTPF - drafting concluding statement
>
> The document was closed to all who had been working at a point so that it
> would not be in flux as we entered the meeting.
>
> michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Interesting. I just followed up on Jeremy's invitation. made a comment.
> >and
> >was subsequently tossed out of the discussion and am now denied access
> >to making any further comments. Any explanation for this?
> >
> >
> >
> >(
> Avri Doria
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130516/7a029589/attachment.htm>