[bestbits] Re: [IRPCoalition] Input needed on options for delivery of international civil society letter to Congress on NSA

[Joana Varon]

Dear all,

I'm also fine with the suggestions. Thanks for moving further with this and
sorry for being away in the thread for a while.

One topic of concern: Do we have any media strategy to also increase the
outreach of this action? Maybe this could be one of the focus of the
meeting today here in Tunis as well.

best

joana


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Marianne Franklin
<m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>wrote:

>  Dear all****
>
> ** **
>
> All sounds good from here (in Europe). As a follow-up and to keep up the
> publicizing dimension we can publicize both letters coming out of this
> mobilization (to the Un HRC and US Congress) this week in Lisbon at the
> Euro DIG. IRP have a workshop in rights and responsibilities for internet
> futures and a flash panel around this current controversy so in this venue,
> with industry and government reps there we can underscore the points being
> made. ****
>
> ** **
>
> All the best with the send-off****
>
> ** **
>
> Best****
>
> MF****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Malcolm
> *Sent:* 17 June 2013 01:37
> *To:* Deborah Brown
> *Cc:* michael gurstein; webwewant at googlegroups.com; <
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>; irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> *Subject:* [bestbits] Re: [IRPCoalition] Input needed on options for
> delivery of international civil society letter to Congress on NSA****
>
> ** **
>
> On 16/06/2013, at 11:36 PM, Deborah Brown <deborah at accessnow.org> wrote:**
> **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> 1) Send it from a higher profile international group, like HRW.****
>
> 2) send it from a Best Bits email address.****
>
> 3) Send it from a US org with int'l operations, such as EFF or CDT.****
>
> 4) Send from ACLU:****
>
> 5) Send from the Web Foundation.****
>
> ** **
>
> It doesn't really matter which the sending address, but I suggest to try
> in the order given above, or, as Gene said, there is no reason why it can't
> have more than one sender address.  I've created
> steering at lists.bestbits.net and will work with Andrew to accelerate the
> process of forming the steering group to receive from that address today.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> On 17/06/2013, at 2:12 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:***
> *
>
>
>
> ****
>
> What about delivering this to the UN?****
>
> ** **
>
> Not appropriate for this letter in my view, but we need to work on the
> next steps from the delivery of the previous letter.****
>
> ** **
>
> --****
>
> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com****
>
> Internet and Open Source lawyer, consumer advocate and geek****
>
> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>



-- 

-- 

Joana Varon Ferraz
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV) <http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/>
@joana_varon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130617/a0fd88c8/attachment.htm>