[bestbits] Re: [IRPCoalition] Input needed on options for delivery of international civil society letter to Congress on NSA

[Marianne Franklin]

Dear all

All sounds good from here (in Europe). As a follow-up and to keep up the publicizing dimension we can publicize both letters coming out of this mobilization (to the Un HRC and US Congress) this week in Lisbon at the Euro DIG. IRP have a workshop in rights and responsibilities for internet futures and a flash panel around this current controversy so in this venue, with industry and government reps there we can underscore the points being made.

All the best with the send-off

Best
MF

From: bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] On Behalf Of Jeremy Malcolm
Sent: 17 June 2013 01:37
To: Deborah Brown
Cc: michael gurstein; webwewant at googlegroups.com; <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>; irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
Subject: [bestbits] Re: [IRPCoalition] Input needed on options for delivery of international civil society letter to Congress on NSA

On 16/06/2013, at 11:36 PM, Deborah Brown <deborah at accessnow.org<mailto:deborah at accessnow.org>> wrote:


1) Send it from a higher profile international group, like HRW.
2) send it from a Best Bits email address.
3) Send it from a US org with int'l operations, such as EFF or CDT.
4) Send from ACLU:
5) Send from the Web Foundation.

It doesn't really matter which the sending address, but I suggest to try in the order given above, or, as Gene said, there is no reason why it can't have more than one sender address.  I've created steering at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:steering at lists.bestbits.net> and will work with Andrew to accelerate the process of forming the steering group to receive from that address today.

On 17/06/2013, at 2:12 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com<mailto:gurstein at gmail.com>> wrote:


What about delivering this to the UN?

Not appropriate for this letter in my view, but we need to work on the next steps from the delivery of the previous letter.

--
Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, consumer advocate and geek
host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org<http://e164.org>|awk -F! '{print $3}'


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130617/935c4d3f/attachment.htm>