[bestbits] [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

*+ 2*
Louis
- - -

On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 8:50 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Jeremy,
>
>
>
> I’m not quite sure who you are addressing with your message below, but if
> is meant to be CS in IG as a whole perhaps it would be better to phrase
> what you have written as “the coordinating group will be responsible for
> “its” nominations” since as already noted the CI community has launched
> its own nominating process and will be submitting nominations, to the
> appropriate authority as that becomes clear, in parallel to those of CC-CS.
> I would add that I agree with Parminder’s point that CS should not be going
> through a third party for its nominations (this was generally, perhaps
> universally, agreed to in Bali).
>
>
>
> As well, it should be noted that at this point precisely the provenance of
> Inet is not clear.  If Inet is a creature of ICANN then we, as CS overall
> should be concerned since ICANN is not CS and may, because of its
> activities and mandate have its own interests which it may be concerned to
> pursue in this context as with others. If Inet is rather more linked to I*
> then clearly we should not be passing our nominations through a body
> organically linked to one of the other stakeholder groups.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Malcolm
> *Sent:* Friday, December 27, 2013 9:48 PM
> *To:* parminder
> *Cc:* William Drake; Governance; Carlos A. Afonso; Best Bits; Anriette
> Esterhuysen
> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR
> meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013
>
>
>
> On 27 Dec 2013, at 10:41 pm, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> In any case, I request the leaderships of IGC, BB, APC and IRP colaition
> to let us know what there current position is on this issue, and what do
> they propose to do since it seems that things are going in the direction
> that they did not want them to go..
>
>
>
> Just speaking personally for now, while I remain skeptical about 1net, I
> am content with the position that Ian has described, that the coordinating
> group will be responsible for the nominations, and the 1net committee will
> just be a conduit.  I don't see much "value add" there, but neither do I
> see grave harm.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> *Dr Jeremy MalcolmSenior Policy OfficerConsumers International | the
> global campaigning voice for consumers*
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131228/9ae1bb9a/attachment.htm>