[bestbits] EurActiv - Professor Svallfors: "Edward Snowden deserves the Sakharov Prize"

[JOSEFSSON Erik]

Hello!

In case you have not seen the article on EurActiv already.

Link:
http://www.euractiv.com/pa/edward-snowden-deserves-sakharov-analysis-530027

Original article:
http://www.sydsvenskan.se/opinion/aktuella-fragor/lat-snowden-fa-sacharovpriset/

Professor Svallfors own tweet:
https://twitter.com/StefanSvallfors/status/373357194172833792

Here's formal Sakharov info: http://mjuk.is/sakharov.pdf

Best regards.

//Erik

*Edward Snowden deserves the Sakharov Prize***
****
****
****

A deserving recipient of the 2013 Sakharov prize would be the American
whistleblower Edward Snowden, writes Stefan Svallfors. By exposing the
US Prism spying program, Snowden made it possible for us to say 'No --
this is not a development and a society we want', he argues.

/Stefan Svallfors is Professor of Sociology at Umeå University (Sweden)
and the Institute for Future Studies (Denmark). This op-ed was
originally published in Swedish in Sydsvenska dagbladet on 29 August 2013. /

Since 1988, the European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov Prize.
According to its statutes, this is given to a person or group "who made
remarkable efforts to defend human rights and fundamental freedoms" and
thus "worked against intolerance, fanaticism and oppression."

The award is given in memory of the Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov
(1921-1989), known as one of the men behind the hydrogen bomb but even
more as a Soviet dissident with his Human Rights Committee and his
defence of political prisoners. Sakharov stands as a symbol of the
individual human being who dares to stand up against tyranny and
oppression, even when the personal cost is very high.

A most deserving recipient of the 2013 price would be the American
whistle blower Edward Snowden. In May, The Guardian published his
disclosure of the extensive, illegal and deeply intrusive monitoring
conducted by the American National Security Agency. For this heroic
effort Snowden has paid a heavy personal price. He is hunted as an
outlaw by the U.S. government, accused of crimes that will put him in
jail for the rest of his life. The U.S. government has threatened the
governments that dare to offer him asylum with serious consequences. In
a painful irony, the only sanctuary that had been found for Snowden is
Russia, a country whose democratic problems and authoritarian tendencies
are obvious.

But is really Snowden a worthy recipient of the prize, someone may
sneeze. Is not America the world's leading democracy, a friend of
Europe, committed to the rule of law? Yes. But even democracies can hide
pockets of tyranny in their hearts: a democratic state may well coexist
with other systems that are characterised by anything but democracy and
law. As the monitoring system which now puts its global tentacles far
into the private lives of citizens. By exposing this system Snowden made
it possible for us to say No -- this is not a development and a society
we want, we protect our civil rights and freedoms when they are threatened.

Snowden's revelations make explicit demands on citizens and politicians
to act and react. How have we responded to these demands? Not in any
impressive way one must say. Individual politicians and many citizens
have reacted, expressed support for Snowden, trying to act in his
defence. They see the unpleasant consequences of a surveillance system
where innocent citizens get their electronic communication and their
phone calls tapped and mapped. The German President Joachim Gauck, with
his personal East German experience, for example stated that Snowden
"deserves respect" for his actions. But otherwise an awkward silence,
evasive answers, gentle tiptoeing. Merkel hums, The European Commission
whispers, the parliaments remain silent.

On the Swedish side, even more depressing inaction is observed. Sweden
acts together with Britain to make sure the question should not be
addressed at European level. This is a bilateral issue and by the way,
no Swedish interests are at stake, the Foreign Minister distractedly
announces before returning to Twitter. The government obviously sees no
reason to allow this issue to eclipse the splendor of Obama's
forthcoming state visit. From the political left, a complete disinterest
is shown. No social democratic position is advanced or even formulated.

It is tragic to see how thin the liberal veneer is in many places. When
liberalism is no longer easy and obvious, when it requires courage and
sacrifice, when we are forced to choose and our choices have real costs,
what happens then? We fall into line, we bend to power. Without
grumbling we let fairly manageable threats from terrorists sweep away
fundamental rights and freedoms.

We must demand more of ourselves and our elected officials than that. We
could start by giving Edward Snowden the prize whose name symbolises a
man who refused to bow to oppression and thereby actually changed history.



-- 
Erik Josefsson
Advisor on Internet Policies
Greens/EFA Group
<http://www.greens-efa.eu/36-details/josefsson-erik-138.html>
GSM: *+32484082063*
BXL: PHS 04C075 TEL: +3222832667
SBG: WIC M03005 TEL: +33388173776
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130830/7ae07ee1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130830/7ae07ee1/attachment.sig>