[Governance] IPv6 scarcity and gross access issues.

[Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance]

This doesn’t look like v6 scarcity, it looks like an SP that needs one or more Sanog / apricot / apnic training sessions.

--srs
________________________________
From: Governance <governance-bounces at lists.igcaucus.org> on behalf of Sivasubramanian M via Governance <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 2:49:19 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
Subject: Re: [Governance] IPv6 scarcity and gross access issues.

I posted this on Aug 17, 2025, 4:36 PM but there was a mail delivery delay for over a day:  There are two updates.  1) The explainer video and a PDF file in the blog https://wealthyworld.blogspot.com/ has been updated, the video is no longer the same as posted; there is also a mindmap for a better summary of issues. 2. There was a call from Reliance Jio Mumbai an hour ago that indicated that JioCare Priority has received the message and is acting on the local issues;  Having said that for fairness, the fundamental issues of end user interest remain regardless of how the immediate individual local problems are resolved.

 Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
sender


On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM Sivasubramanian M <6.internet at gmail.com<mailto:6.internet at gmail.com>> wrote:

Here is a fundamental policy question regarding network access and user autonomy:

Core Question: When an end-user is provided network access through equipment with the following characteristics, do they have an "Internet" connection or merely an "internet" connection?

Equipment limitations:

  *   Unchangeable TR-69 configuration
  *   Telnet enabled by default with no option to disable
  *   SSH enabled by default with no option to disable
  *   Unchangeable administrative passwords
  *   Complete denial of both IPv4 and IPv6 address assignment/configuration
  *   With another ISP, it is an immaculate white "black" box with zero user access

Related questions: Is there any meaningful Internet access when users cannot control their network equipment? How do we address forced exposure to potentially vulnerable protocols? Should "Internet" access imply certain minimum user control standards? What level of technical autonomy should users expect from their ISP?

The distinction between "Internet" (the whole Internet) and "internet" (some form of a walled local network) may have significant implications for policy discussions around net neutrality, user rights, and access standards.

Background materials:

  *   Audio: (unlisted) https://youtu.be/fNwT0kx1Dzg # uploaded 12 days ago
  *   Video: (unlisted) https://youtu.be/H8XBZPOaGbA # includes updates
  *   Blog (Public, but rather unlisted) summary: https://wealthyworld.blogspot.com/ # a complete account, with embedded PDFs

Brought to this list for a discussion.

(I have never recorded phone calls before.  I set my phone to record some of these support phone calls because of a certain situation)

Thank you.
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20250820/4b2e1161/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Governance mailing list
Governance at lists.igcaucus.org
https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance