[Governance] Joint Statement from NTEN and EFF on Rejection of Sale of .ORG

[Ian Peter]

I find it hard to describe ISOCs internal staff decision making 
processes without proper member involvement, its quasi-global facade, 
and a lot of their history as suggesting it would be the best ongoing 
home for .org. I don't yet see anything in ISOC's response to this to 
suggest that they have learned anything from it and intend to be more 
membership driven.

But as Parminder says, what's the alternative? It would need to be a 
membership driven and well established global NGO...not necessarily one 
which evolved from the "internet governance" space, just one which has a 
record of supporting and involving NGOs in all aspects of an existing 
and well respected global entity. I think we should keep our options 
open at this stage.

Ian Peter

------ Original Message ------
From: "parminder via Governance" <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Sent: 1/05/2020 4:17:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Governance] Joint Statement from NTEN and EFF on Rejection 
of Sale of .ORG

>Congrats to all those made this possible.
>
>Meanwhile, on the below statement, I am wary of looking for a new home 
>for .org. For anyone to make a convincing case for that let us hear 
>about some possibilities which are more more global and representative 
>than ISOC, with all its faults, which I would rather focus on 
>improving. I havent heard about any such alternative. I do not want a 
>US or EU based NGO  -- however stellar their record, to take over, with 
>no global basis or structure.  I mean here at least we did have a 
>chapters systems, and their advice to the Board (which in the end I 
>think had a strong role to play in the .org saga.). Can you please give 
>me an example of a comparable system in another NGO, or at least a 
>clearly global governance system? I look forward to it.
>
>Pending that I would not like to join any call asking ICANN to open a 
>new bidding process for .org.
>
>Parminder
>
>On 01/05/20 11:23 AM, Ayden Férdeline via Governance wrote:
>>(emphasis added in bold to one paragraph below)
>>
>>https://savedotorg.org/
>>
>>We are thrilled to see ICANN’s leadership reject the sale 
>><https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-board-withholds-consent-for-a-change-of-control-of-the-public-interest-registry-pir> 
>>of Public Interest Registry (PIR) and the .Org top-level domain.
>>For 20 years, .Org has been the online home for nonprofits, NGOs, and 
>>community-based groups around the world. It serves both those 
>>organizations and the public, helping navigate and support trust, 
>>information and resource sharing, and advocacy.
>>
>>The current global pandemic has further illustrated the importance of 
>>nonprofit websites, as most of the world’s leading scientific and 
>>research institutions, health and safety resources, and educational 
>>services are on .Org websites. The need for reliability and security 
>>of the .Org domain is as high as it ever has been, and the proposal to 
>>convert PIR from a nonprofit to a for-profit entity and then sell it 
>>to private equity firm Ethos Capital would have jeopardized both.
>>
>>We want to thank the nearly 900 organizations and the 64,000* 
>>individuals from all over the world who joined us in calling for the 
>>sale to be stopped. The collective voices made a difference.
>>
>>This is not the final step needed for protecting the .Org domain. 
>>ICANN must now open a public process for bids to find a new home for 
>>the .Org domain. ICANN has established processes and criteria that 
>>outline how to hold a reassignment process. We look forward to seeing 
>>a competitive process and are eager to support the participation in 
>>that process by the global nonprofit community.
>>
>>The .Org domain, the third-largest top-level domain, needs a secure 
>>and reliable steward that can prove it has the public and nonprofit 
>>sector’s interests at its core.
>>
>>Additional SaveDotOrg coalition signers:
>>Access Now
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20200502/548f3fa4/attachment.htm>