[governance] PIR Case/or the .org sell
James Gannon
james at cyberinvasion.net
Thu Nov 28 13:40:50 EST 2019
Im sorry but I have I have said in other public for a, including the access town hall, I wont engage with pure unfounded and factless information, I would much prefer that instead of shouting at the wall, the non commercial community actually step up and start working towards actual concrete steps to lower the risks or to ensure compliance with the statements from ISOC and Ethos around their plans, FUD gets us nowhere.
From: Sylvain Baya <abscoco at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 28 November 2019 at 19:18
To: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>, IGCaucus <governance at lists.riseup.net>
Cc: Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
Subject: [governance] PIR Case/or the .org sell
Hi all,
Le jeudi 28 novembre 2019, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> a écrit :
Without commenting on the details just want to call out that we had a statement from ISOC BoT members yesterday that less than 1% of .org registrations sit with not for profits, food for thought in these dicsussions on impact.
Dear James,
...please tell them that they can (even without sourcing their affirmation) then note that the
minority of *non-commercial* [1] Internet Community is about to be *eliminated* by their
'well intended' *big deal*.
Why ?
...i guess that 1% of 10M (domain names) +=> the non-commercial [1] world is under
the pressure of commercial world in the Internet, even in .ORG registrations they are
still oppressed by 99% of 10M :'-(
Questions :
•—•
|1) Do you think that the non-commercial [1] world should be eliminated to the Internet ?
|
|2) Which solution would you propose to the non-commercial Internet Community
| to resist then continue to exist ?
|
|3) Do you see the FotI (Future of the Internet) [2] without the non-commercial [1]
| Community ?
|
|4) How are you understanding the *vision* [3] of the InternetSociety.ORG ?
|
|5) Do you think that the *Building Trust* [4] commitment is compatible with all
| the consequences of the sale of the Public Interest Registry (PIR) ? {..including:
| eliminating the non-commercial [1] World in the Internet}
|
|6) What is you understanding of words such as inclusiveness, multistakeholder, ... ?
|
|7) •
•—•
__
[1]: It's a word ! see criterion 4 to 7 <https://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/org/criteria#6>
[2]: FotI <https://future.internetsociety.org/>
[3]: <https://www.internetsociety.org/about-internet-society/mission>
[4]: <https://www.internetsociety.org/issues/trust>
Shalom,
--sb.
On 28.11.19, 14:57, "governance-request at lists.riseup.net<mailto:governance-request at lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Norbert Bollow" <governance-request at lists.riseup.net<mailto:governance-request at lists.riseup.net> on behalf of nb at bollow.ch<mailto:nb at bollow.ch>> wrote:
[...]
--
--
Best Regards !
baya.sylvain [AT cmNOG DOT cm] | <https://www.cmnog.cm> | <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
Subscribe to Mailing List : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
__
#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!»
#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement
«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!» (#Psaumes42:2)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191128/d2467cc7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Governance
mailing list