[governance] PIR and ETHOS Convene Community Webinar on 12/19

[George Sadowsky (via governance Mailing List)]

> Ayden,
> 
> You are right so far, but now Ethos Capital is wiliing to answer questions  --  next Thursday.  in fairness, let's listen, so that this discussion can become more fact based.

George
> 
> On Dec 13, 2019, at 2:39 PM, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> 
> There is a Latin phrase that comes to mind, and it is "audi alteram partem" the right to be heard before judgment is passed is critical for fairness sake.
> 
> Sure, but it has been Ethos Capital that has opted not to respond to questions and comments, and ISOC who has been far from transparent about how this deal came to be.
> 
> Ayden Férdeline 
> 
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, December 13, 2019 1:51 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <governance at lists.riseup.net> wrote:
> 
>> I have purposefully refrained from commenting on the issue until now but wish to be on record for wholeheartedly supporting and endorsing George's comments and view on the matter. There is a Latin phrase that comes to mind, and it is "audi alteram partem" the right to be heard before judgment is passed is critical for fairness sake.
>> 
>> From within ICANN, the global community has to review the PDP and content in terms of making it mandatory to require Express written consent from all the supporting organisations, advisory committees that the re-selling of what was initially conferred as a "public interest commodity" is not commercially exploited to the extent where it harms global public interest.
>> 
>> Sala
>> 
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, 4:29 am George Sadowsky, <governance at lists.riseup.net <mailto:governance at lists.riseup.net>> wrote:
>> The announcement of this Webinar is a very promising development.
>> 
>> Perhaps the most prevalent constant in this debate has been secrecy, or lack of information, subjecting the discussion to an enormous stream of hypotheticals.   Ethos has been the most secretive to date, and now it appears that next week they are planning to discuss their plans for .org.  I'm not sure what they will say, but I think that they deserve an equal opportunity to be heard.  What they say will help to inform the discussion.
>> 
>> Sometimes in the heat of the moment we get wrapped up in an issue which, while important, is dwarfed by others that are forgotten in the battle.  This may be one of those moments.
>> 
>> Yesterday ISOC had a 90 minute webinar in which staff discussed their programmatic plans for the future.   I was very impressed with the presenters, with the programmatic thrusts being planned and executed, and with their willingness to be open with regard to how the plan was formed  --  in this case, with significant input from our community.  When being involved in the PIR debate, it's easy to forget that ISOC is an institution whose goals we share, that has done an enormous amount of good work in the past, and who seems dedicated to continue their efforts unabated  into the future.   ISOC is an enormous asset to the open Internet and to the Internet community.
>> 
>> Like some of you, I felt a disappointment in the way in which the PIR decision was handled, and assuming at portfolio diversification was the goal, I believe that it could have been better achieved in a different manner.  But I would much rather accept and live with that disappointment and see ISOC succeed, than see ISOC robbed of any opportunity to continue its work effectively due to the lack of closure of the PIR debate.
>> 
>> No matter how the PIR issue is resolved, we must come out of this process, and soon, with an ISOC that is whole, able to do its work and able to command the voluntary cooperation and affiliation and enthusiasm of a strong membership. 
>> 
>> The eventual disposition of PIR should not be our primary concern, rather it should be ensuring that the goals of ISOC that we share with them should be furthered in the most effective manner possible.  Let's remember that in the course of this discussion and not make it more difficult to achieve the real goal.
>> 
>> George
>> 
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> George Sadowsky                                    Residence tel: +1.301.968.4325
>> 8300 Burdette Road, Apt B-472                          Mobile: +1.202.415.1933
>> Bethesda MD  20817-2831  USA                                    Skype: sadowsky      
>> george.sadowsky at gmail.com <mailto:george.sadowsky at gmail.com>                http://www.georgesadowsky.org/ <http://www.georgesadowsky.org/> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>>
>> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists <https://riseup.net/lists>>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
George Sadowsky                                    Residence tel: +1.301.968.4325
8300 Burdette Road, Apt B-472                          Mobile: +1.202.415.1933
Bethesda MD  20817-2831  USA                                    Skype: sadowsky      
george.sadowsky at gmail.com                http://www.georgesadowsky.org/ 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191213/74045ff1/attachment.htm>