[governance] PIR Case/or the .org sell

[Imran Ahmed Shah (via governance Mailing List)]

 I also agree for the issuance of strong statement form CS (initiated by IGC, endorsed by APC and other coalition partners, e.g. Access Now).
I personally suggest that our statement should insist on 'reversal of the transaction/ deal', and 'not to discuss or address the mechanism of handling CS concerns by the commercial entity'. In order to stop current process of due-diligence, CS have to intervene immediately without waiting for findings of due-diligence process.
 Best Regards
Imran Ahmed Shah 
Consultant/ Advisor
TLDiansUrdu Internet Council
    On Monday, 2 December 2019, 09:23:42 GMT+5, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:  
 
 Agree with Brett Parminder and others who suggest a statement might be a 
better output than questions.

Ian

------ Original Message ------
From: "Bill Woodcock" <woody at pch.net>
To: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh at hserus.net>
Cc: "Imran Ahmed Shah" <ias_pk at yahoo.com>; "IGCaucus" 
<governance at lists.riseup.net>
Sent: 2/12/2019 12:28:59 PM
Subject: Re: [governance] PIR Case/or the .org sell

>
>
>>  On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>>
>>  Or given the numbers involved if the organisation buying a .org can show a 501c3 or equivalent certification that says it is a registered non profit in its country of origin give them the domain free
>>
>>  Bill the domainers whatever you like I won’t lose any sleep over it
>
>Yes, exactly.
>
>                                -Bill
>
---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191202/e7c673a7/attachment.htm>