<html><head></head><body><div class="ydpc13ea104yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;" dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><div></div>
        <div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I also agree for the issuance of strong statement form CS (initiated by IGC, endorsed by APC and other  <span>coalition partners, e.g. Access Now).</span></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span><br></span></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span>I personally suggest that our statement should insist on 'reversal of the transaction/ deal', and 'not to discuss or address the mechanism of handling CS concerns by the commercial entity'.  <span>In order to stop current process of due-diligence, CS have to intervene immediately without waiting for findings of due-diligence process.</span></span></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span><span><br></span></span></div> <div><div dir="ltr">Best Regards</div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr">Imran Ahmed Shah </div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr">Consultant/ Advisor<br clear="none"></div><div>TLDians</div><div>Urdu Internet Council</div></div><div><br></div>
        
        </div><div id="ydp90021c9byahoo_quoted_6166756863" class="ydp90021c9byahoo_quoted">
            <div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
                
                <div>
                    On Monday, 2 December 2019, 09:23:42 GMT+5, Ian Peter <ian.peter@ianpeter.com> wrote:
                </div>
                <div><br></div>
                <div><br></div>
                <div><div dir="ltr">Agree with Brett Parminder and others who suggest a statement might be a <br clear="none">better output than questions.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Ian<br clear="none"><div class="ydp90021c9byqt6423482346" id="ydp90021c9byqtfd27368"><br clear="none">------ Original Message ------<br clear="none">From: "Bill Woodcock" <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:woody@pch.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">woody@pch.net</a>><br clear="none">To: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:suresh@hserus.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">suresh@hserus.net</a>><br clear="none">Cc: "Imran Ahmed Shah" <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:ias_pk@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ias_pk@yahoo.com</a>>; "IGCaucus" <br clear="none"><<a shape="rect" href="mailto:governance@lists.riseup.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance@lists.riseup.net</a>><br clear="none">Sent: 2/12/2019 12:28:59 PM<br clear="none">Subject: Re: [governance] PIR Case/or the .org sell<br clear="none"><br clear="none">><br clear="none">><br clear="none">>>  On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:suresh@hserus.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">suresh@hserus.net</a>> wrote:<br clear="none">>><br clear="none">>>  Or given the numbers involved if the organisation buying a .org can show a 501c3 or equivalent certification that says it is a registered non profit in its country of origin give them the domain free<br clear="none">>><br clear="none">>>  Bill the domainers whatever you like I won’t lose any sleep over it<br clear="none">><br clear="none">>Yes, exactly.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">>                                 -Bill<br clear="none">><br clear="none"></div></div>---<br clear="none">To unsubscribe: <mailto:<a shape="rect" href="mailto:igc-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">igc-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net</a>><br clear="none">List help: <<a shape="rect" href="https://riseup.net/lists" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://riseup.net/lists</a>><div class="ydp90021c9byqt6423482346" id="ydp90021c9byqtfd95011"><br clear="none"></div></div>
            </div>
        </div></body></html>