[governance] [bestbits] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Tue Apr 2 08:40:49 EDT 2019

I suggest we reach out to some of the WSIS time CS leaders who built the
IGC to step in and direct the course of action.

Also, is there a way to draw up a spread sheet to find how many are not
subscribed to both the lists?

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 5:59 PM Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree with Siva and Remmy BUT who is going to bell the cat? (who will do
> the things suggested)
> Deirdre
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 03:13, sivasubramanian muthusamy <
> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a comparitive list of best bit subscribers and IGC members? Who
>> is in bestbits while not being part of IGC?
>>
>> Also, what are there other related CS lists discussing IG issues, if not
>> comprehensively, issues such as Privacy, Security, Community Access? Why
>> not invite them to be a part of a larger IG Caucus, irrespective of whether
>> they physically and regularly participate in the global IGF?
>>
>> Is there a way of reaching out to NRIs to ask for the list of CS
>> participants in NRIs?
>>
>> Not merely consolidate, but also expand. A wider CS could bring in
>> creative solutions to the IG process and cause a balance.
>>
>> Sivasubramanian M
>>
>> Sivasubramanian M
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 5:56 PM Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Sivasubramanian,
>>> (Apologies for cross-posting)
>>> Although various people have pointed to the need for a common voice for
>>> civil society in this arena it really seems that there is no longer an
>>> appetite for the individual effort needed for a successful collaboration of
>>> this type. I would be very happy to have this opinion drowned by a chorus
>>> of voices proving me wrong, but I am not expecting to hear them.
>>> So I wonder if we should be looking for a new means to and a new process
>>> for collaboration?
>>> Should this be included in the agenda under 2 - Concrete ways forward?
>>> I don't have any real suggestions. I think that, more now than before,
>>> the process depends on individuals being willing to make a commitment of
>>> time energy and effort, and that this is happening in a context where the
>>> general ethos has lost its encouragement of sharing and communal energy.
>>> It needs to become possible again to perceive a common good. Should this
>>> happen by painstakingly linking very small local initiatives, where the
>>> "common good" is easy to see, rather than attempting things on a global
>>> scale (which in fact is "top down")?
>>> Hopefully the discussion on 9th will take us nearer to a solution.
>>> Best wishes
>>> Deirdre
>>>
>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:41, Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only about
>>>> 8 respondents.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the poll
>>>> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the IGC list.
>>>> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits" rather than
>>>> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>>>>
>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>>>>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination, and I know
>>>>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The conversations have
>>>>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current situation
>>>>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>>>>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society coordination
>>>>> on the issues we work on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which gathered a
>>>>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary report of
>>>>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was discussion
>>>>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that however, it
>>>>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree a way
>>>>> forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would be
>>>>> great if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the date and
>>>>> set up a room.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>>>>>
>>>>> *Suggested agenda*
>>>>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>>>>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>>>>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so far!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have
>>>>>> attached the anonymised results as a text document, with a summary included
>>>>>> at the top in case useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first half
>>>>>> spent discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1
>>>>>> hour) and the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC founders and other
>>>>>> key members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a way to
>>>>>> promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to change the
>>>>>> current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding a way forward
>>>>>> which does this and in so doing, responds to the widest possible range of
>>>>>> opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how to proceed, please do
>>>>>> chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a follow up call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be great to
>>>>>>> hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you could fill out
>>>>>>> the survey by COB this Friday that would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide next
>>>>>>> steps next week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to those
>>>>>>>> who have responded already.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you can,
>>>>>>>> by using the link below. The survey responses will feed into the next set
>>>>>>>> of discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a
>>>>>>>>> survey below to gather your views on the future of Bestbits. Following a
>>>>>>>>> call on February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it
>>>>>>>>> was agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather views of all members.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note which
>>>>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to the summaries of
>>>>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to
>>>>>>>>> complete the survey. To inform future discussions in a timely way, please
>>>>>>>>> complete the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any questions
>>>>>>>>> at all, don't hesitate to get in touch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday. For
>>>>>>>>>> those who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list of participants
>>>>>>>>>> and notes here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward for
>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in December and the
>>>>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits and
>>>>>>>>>> IGC have been facing challenges in fulfilling their objectives,
>>>>>>>>>> particularly when it comes to coordination and we agreed to circulate a
>>>>>>>>>> survey to both lists to gather perspectives on four suggested ways forward
>>>>>>>>>> which were discussed on the call. It was suggested that this survey with
>>>>>>>>>> the broader communities feed into a decision on the future of the
>>>>>>>>>> platforms. The survey will be circulated shortly to both lists shortly,
>>>>>>>>>> and your participation would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next steps is
>>>>>>>>>>> this coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full
>>>>>>>>>>> details are included in my previous email and I've updated the
>>>>>>>>>>> etherpad <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>
>>>>>>>>>>> with those planning to attend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best time
>>>>>>>>>>>> for the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full details
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the call, including how to join, are below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>>>>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>>>>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will appear
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the Bluejeans room page. We would like to record and share the link with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the BestBits network on the mailing list. Please let us know if you do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> want the recording to be shared on an open mailing list if you call in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC lists,
>>>>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as information sharing devices:
>>>>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of each
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and I've
>>>>>>>>>>>> also added the names of those who indicated they were available for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member you can join the call
>>>>>>>>>>>> without indicating that in the pad, this is just to have a vague idea of
>>>>>>>>>>>> numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks to those who have shared their perspectives and the relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base again
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the middle of January to agree a way forward. The discussions here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> set up a conference call space for us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as information sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we suggest
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only Bestbits members are invited but that we also reach out to some IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks to help provide some background and inform the discussion only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next week
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the conference room link too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of questions which seem to fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information/discussing things/ working together within IGC and Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separately, would merging the two groups again really improve participation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be done,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we want to do, how we want to do it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who started
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would make much progress.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which many of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us also belong to) which is currently having some difficulty with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifying volunteers to carry out management tasks for the group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and find
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a common voice, but is this the right way to do that now or do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devise something different?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering Committee of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constituted and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since it had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the 2012 ITU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WCIT was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint action was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside of IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had driven the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden agendas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own funding. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and informal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pressure to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability resulted in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us investing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of rules and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people weren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could resuscitate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Bits,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that. But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it as I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new nonprofit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -O -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>>>> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir
>>> William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>
>>
>
> --
> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20190402/1bd7f5b4/attachment.htm>