[governance] [bestbits] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Tue Apr 2 08:29:11 EDT 2019

I agree with Siva and Remmy BUT who is going to bell the cat? (who will do
the things suggested)
Deirdre

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 03:13, sivasubramanian muthusamy <6.internet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Is there a comparitive list of best bit subscribers and IGC members? Who
> is in bestbits while not being part of IGC?
>
> Also, what are there other related CS lists discussing IG issues, if not
> comprehensively, issues such as Privacy, Security, Community Access? Why
> not invite them to be a part of a larger IG Caucus, irrespective of whether
> they physically and regularly participate in the global IGF?
>
> Is there a way of reaching out to NRIs to ask for the list of CS
> participants in NRIs?
>
> Not merely consolidate, but also expand. A wider CS could bring in
> creative solutions to the IG process and cause a balance.
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 5:56 PM Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Sivasubramanian,
>> (Apologies for cross-posting)
>> Although various people have pointed to the need for a common voice for
>> civil society in this arena it really seems that there is no longer an
>> appetite for the individual effort needed for a successful collaboration of
>> this type. I would be very happy to have this opinion drowned by a chorus
>> of voices proving me wrong, but I am not expecting to hear them.
>> So I wonder if we should be looking for a new means to and a new process
>> for collaboration?
>> Should this be included in the agenda under 2 - Concrete ways forward?
>> I don't have any real suggestions. I think that, more now than before,
>> the process depends on individuals being willing to make a commitment of
>> time energy and effort, and that this is happening in a context where the
>> general ethos has lost its encouragement of sharing and communal energy.
>> It needs to become possible again to perceive a common good. Should this
>> happen by painstakingly linking very small local initiatives, where the
>> "common good" is easy to see, rather than attempting things on a global
>> scale (which in fact is "top down")?
>> Hopefully the discussion on 9th will take us nearer to a solution.
>> Best wishes
>> Deirdre
>>
>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:41, Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only about 8
>>> respondents.
>>>
>>> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the poll
>>> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the IGC list.
>>> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits" rather than
>>> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>>>
>>> Sivasubramanian M
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>>>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination, and I know
>>>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The conversations have
>>>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current situation
>>>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>>>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society coordination
>>>> on the issues we work on.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which gathered a
>>>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary report of
>>>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was discussion
>>>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that however, it
>>>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree a way
>>>> forward.
>>>>
>>>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would be
>>>> great if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the date and
>>>> set up a room.
>>>>
>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>>>>
>>>> *Suggested agenda*
>>>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>>>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>>>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so far!
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have attached
>>>>> the anonymised results as a text document, with a summary included at the
>>>>> top in case useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first half spent
>>>>> discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1 hour) and
>>>>> the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC founders and other key
>>>>> members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a way to
>>>>> promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to change the
>>>>> current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding a way forward
>>>>> which does this and in so doing, responds to the widest possible range of
>>>>> opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how to proceed, please do
>>>>> chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a follow up call.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be great to
>>>>>> hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you could fill out
>>>>>> the survey by COB this Friday that would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide next
>>>>>> steps next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to those
>>>>>>> who have responded already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you can, by
>>>>>>> using the link below. The survey responses will feed into the next set of
>>>>>>> discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a survey
>>>>>>>> below to gather your views on the future of Bestbits. Following a call on
>>>>>>>> February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it was
>>>>>>>> agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather views of all members.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note which
>>>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to the summaries of
>>>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to
>>>>>>>> complete the survey. To inform future discussions in a timely way, please
>>>>>>>> complete the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any questions
>>>>>>>> at all, don't hesitate to get in touch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday. For
>>>>>>>>> those who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list of participants
>>>>>>>>> and notes here:
>>>>>>>>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward for
>>>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in December and the
>>>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits and IGC
>>>>>>>>> have been facing challenges in fulfilling their objectives, particularly
>>>>>>>>> when it comes to coordination and we agreed to circulate a survey to both
>>>>>>>>> lists to gather perspectives on four suggested ways forward which were
>>>>>>>>> discussed on the call. It was suggested that this survey with the broader
>>>>>>>>> communities feed into a decision on the future of the platforms. The survey
>>>>>>>>> will be circulated shortly to both lists shortly,  and your participation
>>>>>>>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next steps is
>>>>>>>>>> this coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full
>>>>>>>>>> details are included in my previous email and I've updated the
>>>>>>>>>> etherpad <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>
>>>>>>>>>> with those planning to attend.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best time for
>>>>>>>>>>> the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full details of
>>>>>>>>>>> the call, including how to join, are below.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>>>> speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>>>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>>>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>>>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will appear
>>>>>>>>>>> on the Bluejeans room page. We would like to record and share the link with
>>>>>>>>>>> the BestBits network on the mailing list. Please let us know if you do not
>>>>>>>>>>> want the recording to be shared on an open mailing list if you call in.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>>>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC lists,
>>>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as information sharing devices:
>>>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of each
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>>>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and I've
>>>>>>>>>>> also added the names of those who indicated they were available for the
>>>>>>>>>>> call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member you can join the call
>>>>>>>>>>> without indicating that in the pad, this is just to have a vague idea of
>>>>>>>>>>> numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> to those who have shared their perspectives and the relevant documents too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base again
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the middle of January to agree a way forward. The discussions here
>>>>>>>>>>>> provide rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to
>>>>>>>>>>>> set up a conference call space for us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to decide
>>>>>>>>>>>> next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as information sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we suggest
>>>>>>>>>>>> only Bestbits members are invited but that we also reach out to some IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>> folks to help provide some background and inform the discussion only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next week
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the conference room link too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>>>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of questions which seem to fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information/discussing things/ working together within IGC and Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>> separately, would merging the two groups again really improve participation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be done,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we want to do, how we want to do it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who started IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would make much progress.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which many of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us also belong to) which is currently having some difficulty with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifying volunteers to carry out management tasks for the group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and find a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> common voice, but is this the right way to do that now or do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> devise something different?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering Committee of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constituted and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since it had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the 2012 ITU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WCIT was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint action was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had driven the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden agendas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own funding. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and informal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pressure to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability resulted in us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of rules and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people weren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could resuscitate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Bits,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that. But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it as I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new nonprofit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -O -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sivasubramanian M
>>> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
>> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>
>

-- 
“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20190402/56df376f/attachment.htm>