[governance] [bestbits] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Thu Apr 4 23:11:48 EDT 2019

I wasn't aware that it was formally decided by the Bestbits list to discuss
this list-wise. Posting a note here on a different problem. The  igcaucus.
org mailbox is NOT receiving messages, who is managing the Governance lists
please?

Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
twitter.com/shivaindia

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:03 PM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Sivasubramanian,
>
> I think what was agreed was that the survey should be limited to Bestbit
> only and that the discussion about merging should be limited to each group.
> This would enable each group to do a kind of an independent assessment that
> would inform the decision of whether the group should cease or merge. Also,
> I could remember that some folks on the IGC group wants IGC to remain as it
> is.
>
> @Deirdre Williams I remembered I openly shared some contacts on the IGC
> list back then, which might be the privacy issue you are referring to.
> Aside of that, I don't think I was in the picture of any privacy issue that
> affected the group. Maybe Jeremy could throw more light on this.
>
> I could also remembered during the review of CSCG, part of our discussion
> was to accommodate regional civil society organization in the sphere of IG
> but the challenge of the individual wearing many hat remains.
>
> Regards.
> Peter
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:41 PM Sivasubramanian M <
> governance at lists.riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only about 8
>> respondents.
>>
>> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the poll
>> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the IGC list.
>> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits" rather than
>> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>>
>> Sivasubramanian M
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination, and I know
>>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The conversations have
>>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current situation
>>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society coordination
>>> on the issues we work on.
>>>
>>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which gathered a
>>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary report of
>>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was discussion
>>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that however, it
>>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree a way
>>> forward.
>>>
>>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would be great
>>> if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the date and set up a
>>> room.
>>>
>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>>>
>>> *Suggested agenda*
>>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>>>
>>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so far!
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Sheetal.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have attached
>>>> the anonymised results as a text document, with a summary included at the
>>>> top in case useful.
>>>>
>>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first half spent
>>>> discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1 hour) and
>>>> the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC founders and other key
>>>> members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call too.
>>>>
>>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a way to
>>>> promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to change the
>>>> current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding a way forward
>>>> which does this and in so doing, responds to the widest possible range of
>>>> opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how to proceed, please do
>>>> chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a follow up call.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be great to
>>>>> hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you could fill out
>>>>> the survey by COB this Friday that would be much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide next
>>>>> steps next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to those
>>>>>> who have responded already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you can, by
>>>>>> using the link below. The survey responses will feed into the next set of
>>>>>> discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a survey
>>>>>>> below to gather your views on the future of Bestbits. Following a call on
>>>>>>> February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it was
>>>>>>> agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather views of all members.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note which
>>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to the summaries of
>>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to
>>>>>>> complete the survey. To inform future discussions in a timely way, please
>>>>>>> complete the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any questions at
>>>>>>> all, don't hesitate to get in touch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday. For
>>>>>>>> those who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list of participants
>>>>>>>> and notes here:
>>>>>>>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward for
>>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in December and the
>>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits and IGC
>>>>>>>> have been facing challenges in fulfilling their objectives, particularly
>>>>>>>> when it comes to coordination and we agreed to circulate a survey to both
>>>>>>>> lists to gather perspectives on four suggested ways forward which were
>>>>>>>> discussed on the call. It was suggested that this survey with the broader
>>>>>>>> communities feed into a decision on the future of the platforms. The survey
>>>>>>>> will be circulated shortly to both lists shortly,  and your participation
>>>>>>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next steps is this
>>>>>>>>> coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full details
>>>>>>>>> are included in my previous email and I've updated the etherpad
>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture> with those
>>>>>>>>> planning to attend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best time for
>>>>>>>>>> the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full details of the
>>>>>>>>>> call, including how to join, are below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>>> speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will appear on
>>>>>>>>>> the Bluejeans room page. We would like to record and share the link with
>>>>>>>>>> the BestBits network on the mailing list. Please let us know if you do not
>>>>>>>>>> want the recording to be shared on an open mailing list if you call in.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC lists,
>>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as information sharing devices:
>>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of each
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and I've
>>>>>>>>>> also added the names of those who indicated they were available for the
>>>>>>>>>> call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member you can join the call
>>>>>>>>>> without indicating that in the pad, this is just to have a vague idea of
>>>>>>>>>> numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> to those who have shared their perspectives and the relevant documents too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base again
>>>>>>>>>>> in the middle of January to agree a way forward. The discussions here
>>>>>>>>>>> provide rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to
>>>>>>>>>>> set up a conference call space for us.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to decide
>>>>>>>>>>> next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as information sharing
>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we suggest
>>>>>>>>>>> only Bestbits members are invited but that we also reach out to some IGC
>>>>>>>>>>> folks to help provide some background and inform the discussion only.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next week
>>>>>>>>>>> (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the conference room link too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of questions which seem to fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>>>> are saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>> information/discussing things/ working together within IGC and Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>> separately, would merging the two groups again really improve participation?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be done, what
>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to do, how we want to do it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who started IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>> and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely that we
>>>>>>>>>>>> would make much progress.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which many of
>>>>>>>>>>>> us also belong to) which is currently having some difficulty with
>>>>>>>>>>>> identifying volunteers to carry out management tasks for the group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and find a
>>>>>>>>>>>> common voice, but is this the right way to do that now or do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>> devise something different?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering Committee of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constituted and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since it had
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the 2012 ITU
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WCIT was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint action was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> important,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had driven the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants having hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agendas
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own funding. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and informal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pressure to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability resulted in us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> investing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of rules and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people weren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could resuscitate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Bits,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that. But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it as I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new nonprofit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i - -O
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge"
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sivasubramanian M
>> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>>
>> ---
>> To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
>> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
> Peter Taiwo Akinremi
> about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20190405/558a1cc7/attachment.htm>