[governance] [bestbits] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Thu Apr 4 10:33:28 EDT 2019

Hi Sivasubramanian,

I think what was agreed was that the survey should be limited to Bestbit
only and that the discussion about merging should be limited to each group.
This would enable each group to do a kind of an independent assessment that
would inform the decision of whether the group should cease or merge. Also,
I could remember that some folks on the IGC group wants IGC to remain as it
is.

@Deirdre Williams I remembered I openly shared some contacts on the IGC
list back then, which might be the privacy issue you are referring to.
Aside of that, I don't think I was in the picture of any privacy issue that
affected the group. Maybe Jeremy could throw more light on this.

I could also remembered during the review of CSCG, part of our discussion
was to accommodate regional civil society organization in the sphere of IG
but the challenge of the individual wearing many hat remains.

Regards.
Peter

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:41 PM Sivasubramanian M <
governance at lists.riseup.net> wrote:

> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only about 8
> respondents.
>
> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the poll
> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the IGC list.
> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits" rather than
> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination, and I know
>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The conversations have
>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current situation
>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society coordination
>> on the issues we work on.
>>
>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which gathered a
>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary report of
>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was discussion
>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that however, it
>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree a way
>> forward.
>>
>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would be great
>> if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the date and set up a
>> room.
>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>>
>> *Suggested agenda*
>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>>
>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so far!
>>
>> Best
>> Sheetal.
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have attached
>>> the anonymised results as a text document, with a summary included at the
>>> top in case useful.
>>>
>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first half spent
>>> discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1 hour) and
>>> the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC founders and other key
>>> members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call too.
>>>
>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a way to
>>> promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to change the
>>> current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding a way forward
>>> which does this and in so doing, responds to the widest possible range of
>>> opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how to proceed, please do
>>> chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a follow up call.
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Sheetal.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be great to
>>>> hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you could fill out
>>>> the survey by COB this Friday that would be much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide next
>>>> steps next week.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to those who
>>>>> have responded already.
>>>>>
>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you can, by
>>>>> using the link below. The survey responses will feed into the next set of
>>>>> discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a survey
>>>>>> below to gather your views on the future of Bestbits. Following a call on
>>>>>> February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it was
>>>>>> agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather views of all members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note which
>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to the summaries of
>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to complete
>>>>>> the survey. To inform future discussions in a timely way, please complete
>>>>>> the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any questions at all,
>>>>>> don't hesitate to get in touch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday. For those
>>>>>>> who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list of participants and
>>>>>>> notes here:  https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward for
>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in December and the
>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits and IGC
>>>>>>> have been facing challenges in fulfilling their objectives, particularly
>>>>>>> when it comes to coordination and we agreed to circulate a survey to both
>>>>>>> lists to gather perspectives on four suggested ways forward which were
>>>>>>> discussed on the call. It was suggested that this survey with the broader
>>>>>>> communities feed into a decision on the future of the platforms. The survey
>>>>>>> will be circulated shortly to both lists shortly,  and your participation
>>>>>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next steps is this
>>>>>>>> coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full details
>>>>>>>> are included in my previous email and I've updated the etherpad
>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture> with those
>>>>>>>> planning to attend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best time for
>>>>>>>>> the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full details of the
>>>>>>>>> call, including how to join, are below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>> speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will appear on
>>>>>>>>> the Bluejeans room page. We would like to record and share the link with
>>>>>>>>> the BestBits network on the mailing list. Please let us know if you do not
>>>>>>>>> want the recording to be shared on an open mailing list if you call in.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC lists,
>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in each
>>>>>>>>> network
>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as information sharing devices:
>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of each
>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and I've
>>>>>>>>> also added the names of those who indicated they were available for the
>>>>>>>>> call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member you can join the call
>>>>>>>>> without indicating that in the pad, this is just to have a vague idea of
>>>>>>>>> numbers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and thanks
>>>>>>>>>> to those who have shared their perspectives and the relevant documents too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base again in
>>>>>>>>>> the middle of January to agree a way forward. The discussions here provide
>>>>>>>>>> rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to set up a
>>>>>>>>>> conference call space for us.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to decide
>>>>>>>>>> next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as information sharing
>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we suggest
>>>>>>>>>> only Bestbits members are invited but that we also reach out to some IGC
>>>>>>>>>> folks to help provide some background and inform the discussion only.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next week
>>>>>>>>>> (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the conference room link too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and have a couple
>>>>>>>>>>> of questions which seem to fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy are
>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing information/discussing
>>>>>>>>>>> things/ working together within IGC and Bestbits separately, would merging
>>>>>>>>>>> the two groups again really improve participation?
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be done, what
>>>>>>>>>>> we want to do, how we want to do it?
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who started IGC
>>>>>>>>>>> and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely that we
>>>>>>>>>>> would make much progress.
>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which many of us
>>>>>>>>>>> also belong to) which is currently having some difficulty with identifying
>>>>>>>>>>> volunteers to carry out management tasks for the group.
>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and find a
>>>>>>>>>>> common voice, but is this the right way to do that now or do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>> devise something different?
>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering Committee of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits -
>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was constituted
>>>>>>>>>>>> and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since it had been
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to
>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the 2012 ITU WCIT
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint action was
>>>>>>>>>>>> important,
>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and outside
>>>>>>>>>>>> of IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had driven the
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC into
>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants having hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>> agendas
>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own funding. So
>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas the
>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and informal,
>>>>>>>>>>>> pressure to
>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability resulted in us
>>>>>>>>>>>> investing
>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of rules and
>>>>>>>>>>>> processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people weren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could resuscitate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Bits,
>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that. But I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it as I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new nonprofit
>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i - -O -
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge"
>>>>>>>>>>> Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
>
> --
> Sivasubramanian M
> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
>

-- 
<https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
Peter Taiwo Akinremi
about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
<https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20190404/4e78a35b/attachment.htm>