[governance] Update on CSCG Working Group

Nadira Alaraj nadira.araj at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 18:21:52 EDT 2016 

+1 for 2 coordinators as CSCG,
This year it good kind of hectic on the CSCG due the nomination requests
that
​ consumed quite sometime from the CS representatives. ​If there were two
representatives, they could have swapped the roles on each nomination task
that resulted of the reduction of the load.




On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:

> Hi Arsene,
>
> Having the two coordinators as CSCG members would be the easiest way
> forward – is there a particular reason you don’t favour that idea?
>
> Otherwise – I don’t see a problem with the coordinators calling for
> expressions of interest from IGC membership and then determining the best
> representative (this could be either a nomcom or a decision of the
> coordinators)
>
>
> Ian
>
>
> *From:* Arsene TUNGALI (Yahoo) <arsenebaguma at yahoo.fr>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 5:59 PM
> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
> ; Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [governance] Update on CSCG Working Group
>
> @Remmy, I would love to hear your thoughts (as an IGC member) as it will
> help move the debate forward.
>
> I am interested in hearing from our group members on the following...
>
> Currently (and I think for the past few years), we (as ICG) have been
> having only one rep in the CSCG and it used to be one of the co-cos, each
> one serving one year and leaving the following year to the other co-co.
> This means, after Analia, I am the one representing us on the CSCG until
> the next one is elected. We can still discuss this way of doing if someone
> is not happy :)
>
> But my question is this: Now that these suggested changes withing the CSCG
> suggest we have two reps from each coalition member, I would love to hear
> your thoughs on how we, as IGC we will be dealing with nominating our
> representatives. My take is that we should not have both co-cos there but
> maybe have one co-co and have another member (to be chosen, process to be
> agreed on).
>
> I suggest we start thinking on this so that when the final work of the WG
> will be presented and agreed upon by all coalition members, we know what to
> do. I am part of that WG and will be happy to bring in these debates.
>
> Please do share your comments. And I am happy Ian is here as well and can
> contribute.
> Hope everyone is doing well,
> A
> *------------------------------------------------------*
> *Arsène Tungali,*
> IGC Co-Coordinator,
> Co-founder & Executive Director, Rudi International
> <http://www.rudiinternational.org/>
> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/arsenebaguma> - Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/arsenebaguma> -LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/arsene-tungali/40/825/344/>
> Internet Governance - Blogger - ISOC Ambassador - ICANN Fellow - Child
> Online Protection Evangelist.
> Democratic Republic of Congo
>
>
> Le Vendredi 1 juillet 2016 19h23, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Thanks Ian for the update.
> There are some issues I should have revisited but since you said there is
> room for refining and expansion I will leave them when the group resumes.
> Nice to bring us up to speed.
> Remmy
> On Jul 1, 2016 6:27 AM, "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>
> Folks, here is a summary of the progress so far of the CSCG Working Group
> – my personal summary, happy for any comments from other WG members or
> anyone else interested. Feel free to copy to other lists.
>
> GENERAL AGREEMENT SO FAR
> Maintain “coalition of coalitions” model
> Two year terms for coalition representatives, 2 reps per member, stand
> down after max two terms (4 years) before being eligible for re-election
> again
> Chair elected by members – can be from among members or an outsider
> Chair plus up to two co-chairs – co-chairs from member reps.
> Nomcoms are one rep per member coalition plus separate non voting chair
> Scope to remain solely to ensure a coordinated civil society response and
> conduit when it comes to making civil society appointments to outside
> bodies.
> Support to develop separate entity - but related body- to look at funding
> issues for civil society representatives travel (eg CSCG members might be
> trustees of new entity)
> ISSUES
> Some discussion has taken place on new coalition members, with a general
> agreement that this might include regional coalitions.  However we need
> to clarify what procedures might be adopted for inclusion of regional
> coalitions and other potential new members.
>
> STILL TO DO
> REFINE AND EXPAND ON SUGGESTED DIRECTIONS ABOVE
> REVISE PROCEDURES
> OUTREACH ISSUES
>
> We hope to wrap up this work by end August.
>
> Ian Peter
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>


--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20160711/0f056900/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list