[governance] On WSIS+10 (was Re: Why?)

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Just on this point below, I actually have more hope, I think it is possible to see an agreement that the action lines going forward should be implemented in order to facilitate success in the SDGs, with perhaps some indication of which elements of the action lines map to which SDGs.

That would be, to me, a very positive step forward. Others may disagree. And on this list, probably in a very large variety of strongly held ways ;)

On 21 May 2015, at 17:40, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:

> I do not expect much from a mere resolution adopted in a two-day meeting in New York with little if any involvement of non-governmental actors in the preparation. At best it will reconduct the IGF with little if any improvements.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150522/22ffb423/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 670 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150522/22ffb423/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t