[governance] For information

José Félix Arias Ynche jaryn56 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 12:44:08 EDT 2015


Para mi parecer, ninguno representa a la comunidad de Internet, y ni
siquiera a la más de 3 mil millones de personas que la utilizan.

¿A los usuarios se les a pedido su opinión, de sus representantes a
dedo?, que mas están por el alto sueldo y las coimas, que por
representar dignamente a los usuarios de Internet.

Sin ir más lejos ¿no se quien representa los intereses de los
internautas en el Perú, en Sudamérica o Latino América y el Caribe,
¿Quienes son y quienes lo han escogido?

Hay tantos intereses corruptos de por medio, que siempre son los
mismos se rotan entre ellos para tapar la podredumbre de aquellas
personas que habiendo sido ¿elegidas? para que sirvan a la sociedad,
han utilizado esta tarea para aprovecharse sin escrúpulos de sus
cargos en su propio beneficio, ego y enriquecimiento personal.







Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche
                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo


2015-03-16 7:03 GMT-05:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:
> Dear Jefsey,
>
> thanks for your kind reply. My comments in-line:
>
>
> On 14/03/2015 11:26, Jefsey wrote:
>> At 20:06 13/03/2015, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>>> Dear Jefsey:
>>> You appear to have forgotten to list the 13th bullet point (the 13th
>>> Community) that is the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) which acts
>>> in the best interests of Internet end users.
>>
>> I certainly know that this is what you wish and try to do. However,
>> unfortunately, claiming acting in the best interest of Internet end
>> users does not mean directly representing them. Lead users (i.e. the
>> permissionless innovation main potential source) and civil sociey are
>> not represented either (neither directly nor indirectly).
>
> I'd be interested in hearing how you propose representing 3Bn people.
> As for civil society, members of civil society organisations are
> extensively participating in the working group. Again there, I think it
> is wise to say they act in the best interest of their community.
>
> The term "representing" has, IMHO, been used too liberally in recent
> years with self appointed people "representing" others who do not know
> anything about their representation.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list